Every category where a model named Prism for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	56 of 69	36%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Prism yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Prism across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Safer alternatives: Mint Bills, Quicken Simplifi, or Prism (generally better-rated).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business bill pay · negative prompt · alternative

“Prism is great if you only need bill tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“claiming to be "Prism Bill Pay" or offering legacy versions, avoid them completely” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · hard negative

“shut down permanently on February 20, 2024. If you run across it, it's defunct.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · hard negative

“Sync-dependent; minor fees from some billers; less active updates recently.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business bill pay · comparative prompt · soft negative

“user reviews are mixed regarding customer support and app stability” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Business bill pay · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prism, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prism was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Doxo11 of 111Not in the top three

BILL8 of 110Not in the top three

Papaya7 of 110Not in the top three

Melio5 of 113Not in the top three

Quicken Bill Manager5 of 110Not in the top three

Bank Bill Pay4 of 113Not in the top three

AvidXchange4 of 110Not in the top three

Ramp4 of 110Not in the top three

Brex2 of 110Not in the top three

PayPal2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prism. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Prism and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thepennyhoarder.com10

gobankingrates.com9

money.usnews.com9

gitnux.org4

reddit.com4

worldmetrics.org4

cashflowpick.com3

consumer.ftc.gov3

rippling.com3

savingadvice.com3

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Prism came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

thepennyhoarder.com/budgeting/bill-pay-services10

gobankingrates.com/saving-money/budgeting/bill-payment-service9

money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/saving-and-budgeting/articles/best-bill-paying-ser9

cashflowpick.com/best-bill-payment-software3

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2024/04/pay-your-bills-not-impersonators3

rippling.com/blog/bill-pay-solutions-for-businesses3

savingadvice.com/articles/2026/09/02/10745828_paying-a-bill-the-ftc-says-dont-trust-the-fi3

worldmetrics.org/best/bill-pay-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prism's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prism, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at prism.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.