Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › MoneyGram · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

MoneyGram

12Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MoneyGram was named 8 times in Cross-border payments and 2 other categories, where Wise Business led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business54 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market57 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise59 of 75

under the label threshold

In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MoneyGram for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	57 of 83	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	33 of 69	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	67 of 83	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MoneyGram yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MoneyGram across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“safe and reliable include ... Western Union, and MoneyGram, which are regulated by relevant authorities and have a good track record” Llama 4 Maverick · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Lowest-rated in Consumer Reports for privacy, safety, and overall performance (45/100 score). Frequently linked to scams” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“No reversibility once the money is picked up (like cash) • Often used in scams, so extra caution is required” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · soft negative

“Why to be cautious: ... paying a contractor directly via wire is risky” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contractor payments · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MoneyGram, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MoneyGram was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Western Union10 of 120Not in the top three

Wise Business7 of 125Not in the top three

PayPal6 of 120Not in the top three

Payoneer5 of 120Not in the top three

Revolut Business5 of 120Not in the top three

Airwallex4 of 120Not in the top three

OFX4 of 120Not in the top three

Remitly4 of 120Not in the top three

Stripe4 of 120Not in the top three

Doxo2 of 121Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MoneyGram. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named MoneyGram and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airwallex.com6

reddit.com6

bis.org5

guideflow.com5

worldfirst.com5

chargeflow.io4

corpay.com4

stripe.com4

xflowpay.com4

xtransfer.com4

Forty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming MoneyGram came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/cross-border-payments-software5

chargeflow.io/blog/cross-border-payments4

corpay.com/resources/blog/choosing-a-new-global-payments-provider-avoiding-pitfalls-in-a-d4

bis.org/pages/cpmi-cross-border-payments-programme/pietf-fraud-report-2026.pdf3

bis.org/publications/paper-167-cross-border-payment-technologies-innovations-and-challenge3

transak.com/blog/cross-border-payment-solutions3

wondergate.io/blog/cross-border-payment-fraud-prevention3

worldfirst.com/uk/blog/international-transactions/best-payoneer-alternatives3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MoneyGram

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MoneyGram; a claim can dispute any of them.

MoneyGram / Western Union 1Western Union & MoneyGram 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MoneyGram's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MoneyGram, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at money.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.