Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › QuickBooks Solopreneur · September 2026 Edition
QuickBooks · 1 category · Named, not ranked

QuickBooks Solopreneur

5Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. QuickBooks Solopreneur was named 3 times in Accounting software, where Sage Intacct led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In accounting software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named QuickBooks Solopreneur for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Accounting softwareAccounting and close0%52 of 5667%3under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for QuickBooks Solopreneur yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated QuickBooks Solopreneur across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Plan to grow quickly: QuickBooks Online (most accountant-compatible)” Kimi K2 · Accounting software · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“QuickBooks Self-Employed — one source bluntly says, “just… don’t,”” Perplexity Sonar · Accounting software · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bookkeepers and CPAs widely recommend avoiding this specific tier.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QuickBooks Solopreneur, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuickBooks Solopreneur was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wave5 of 52Not in the top three
FreshBooks4 of 50Not in the top three
Xero4 of 50Not in the top three
Oracle NetSuite2 of 50Not in the top three
QuickBooks2 of 50Not in the top three
QuickBooks Desktop2 of 50Not in the top three
QuickBooks Online2 of 50Not in the top three
Zoho Books2 of 50Not in the top three
Excel or Google Sheets1 of 50Not in the top three
Manager.io1 of 50Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuickBooks Solopreneur. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named QuickBooks Solopreneur and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as QuickBooks Solopreneur

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as QuickBooks Solopreneur; a claim can dispute any of them.
QuickBooks Self-Employed 1QuickBooks Self-Employed (QBSE) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuickBooks Solopreneur's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuickBooks Solopreneur, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quickbooks.ninja is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack