AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Rainforest · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Rainforest

29Judge labels
4First choices
4Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Embedded payments for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Rainforest →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In embedded payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rainforest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded payments platformsReceivables and billing4%5 of 1100%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rainforest yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rainforest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase10 labels2
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Fastest launch, lowest complexity: Stripe Connect or Rainforest” Kimi K2 · Embedded payments · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Fit: Stripe Connect or Rainforest” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Rainforest — Best for simplicity and keeping 100% of the spread” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Quick Integration & Transparent Buy-Rates: Rainforest” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rainforest, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rainforest was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Payabli9 of 292Not among the top eight
Stax Connect8 of 290Not among the top eight
Worldpay for Platforms7 of 291Not among the top eight
Payrix5 of 290Not among the top eight
Marqeta3 of 290Not among the top eight
Unit3 of 290Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rainforest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Rainforest and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

whop.com21
finix.com19
fintechspecs.com17
fiska.com17
guideflow.com14
zendikt.com14
sourceforge.net13
stripe.com13
chargeforward.io12
swipesum.com11

151 of the 151 domain citations in answers naming Rainforest came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rainforestpay.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rainforest takes 4% of first choices and Stripe Connect takes 53%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded payments platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded payments platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
110,000 a month (“rainforest”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
70,912 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 775 a month
Searches its site ranks for
647 · 11 in the top three
Sites linking to it
745
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as Rainforest Pay, Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 5 of 110 in embedded payments
Segment leader
53%
Stripe Connect
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
29 answers
Its own site cited
in 29 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on rainforestpay.com
166
subdomains included
Content
127
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog119142026-09-29
Comparison212026-08-20
Glossary or explainer212026-08-24
News or press2undated
Report or ebook1undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rainforestpay.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Rainforest

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rainforest is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Embedded payments purpose-built for vertical SaaS
For
vertical SaaS platforms
Price stated
We lead with a buy-rate, interchange-plus pricing model, and have no revenue split. Card Transaction Fees: $0m - $5m 0.30%, $5m - $15m 0.25%, $15m - $25m 0.20%; Monthly Transaction Volume: 0 - 50k $0.30, 50k - 150k $0.25, 150k - 250k $0.20; ACH & Payment Fees: Standard Payout $0.20 / item, ACH Transaction $0.20 / item, Risk Management Fee Risk Dependent; Other Fees: Account Updater $0.23 / item, 3DS $0.31 / attempt, ACH Account Validation $1.49 / validation, Disputes & Returns $15 / item, EMV Terminal Monthly Fee $11.25 / terminal rainforestpay.com/pricing
Starting price
$0.20 / item rainforestpay.com/pricing
Customers named
PayGroundMaterioQuoteMachineRose RocketKeapD-ToolsFieldPulseCrystal Practice Management
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Rainforest's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: rainforestpay.com, rainforestpay.com/pricing, rainforestpay.com/platform-spotlight, rainforestpay.com/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rainforest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rainforest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rainforest by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Rainforest is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rainforest, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rainforestpay.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.