Every category where a model named Worldpay for Platforms for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Embedded payments platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	108 of 110	50%	8	under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Worldpay for Platforms yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Worldpay for Platforms across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase11 labels4

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if: You want enterprise-grade support and are comfortable with larger payment volumes” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“These providers act as "PayFac-as-a-Service" (PFaaS) or "PayFac-in-a-Box"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded payments · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Opaque fee structures, complex enterprise contracts, and long-term agreements that can be difficult to exit.” Mistral Small · Embedded payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if you are a small/mid-sized platform without a dedicated enterprise sales rep.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“robust enterprise options, but they typically require massive existing payment volumes and carry a heavy, complex engineering lift” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded payments · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Less dev-friendly than fintech challengers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded payments · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Worldpay for Platforms, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Worldpay for Platforms was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe Connect29 of 3214Not among the top eight

Adyen for Platforms26 of 328Not among the top eight

Finix21 of 323Not among the top eight

Tilled8 of 320Not among the top eight

Rainforest7 of 321Not among the top eight

Checkout.com5 of 320Not among the top eight

PayPal5 of 320Not among the top eight

Payabli4 of 321Not among the top eight

Braintree3 of 320Not among the top eight

Marqeta3 of 320Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Worldpay for Platforms. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Worldpay for Platforms and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

stripe.com20

whop.com19

finix.com16

guideflow.com16

swipesum.com15

platforms.worldpay.comYour site11

zendikt.com11

fintechspecs.com10

fiska.com9

dashdevs.com8

124 of the 135 domain citations in answers naming Worldpay for Platforms came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

whop.com/blog/embedded-payments-platforms17

guideflow.com/blog/embedded-payments-software15

swipesum.com/insights/best-embedded-payments-payfac-as-a-service-companies15

zendikt.com/top-10-embedded-payments-software11

fintechspecs.com/blog/embedded-payments-providers-b2b-saas9

fiska.com/blog/best-embedded-payment-solutions-for-saas9

stripe.com/resources/more/embedded-payments-how-to-choose-the-right-system9

lendflow.com/post/best-embedded-finance-platforms7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

worldpay.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Worldpay for Platforms takes 0% of first choices and Stripe Connect takes 53%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “embedded payments platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “embedded payments platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“worldpay for platforms”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 11 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 44,677 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,557 · 622 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 15,396
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $111 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

24 ads · 18 text, 6 video · 13 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as Fidelity Information Services, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 11 in the year, 13 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 108 of 110 in embedded payments

Segment leader

53%

Stripe Connect

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 32 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on worldpay.com

10,016

subdomains included

Content

2,783

counted in the table below

Documentation

5,451

Product · Integration

170 · 128

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,503	76	2026-09-23	Accounting software
Case study	543	2	2026-09-17
News or press	423	0	2026-06-23
Report or ebook	179	0	2025-04-17
Glossary or explainer	72	0	2025-05-07
Conference or event	35	undated
Comparison	12	0	2019-08-06
Webinar or virtual event	8	0	2026-04-12
Podcast or video	6	0	2025-06-09
Template or tool	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-23Agentic commerce report 2026 out now blog
2026-09-23Agentic commerce report 2026 out now blog
2026-09-23Agentic commerce report 2026 out now blog
2026-09-23Agentic commerce report 2026 out now blog
2026-09-17Discovery surf school case study
2026-09-17Discovery surf school case study

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page worldpay.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Worldpay for Platforms

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Worldpay for Platforms; a claim can dispute any of them.

Worldpay 3Tilled / Worldpay for Platforms 1Worldpay (Payrix) 1

Follow Worldpay for Platforms

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Worldpay for Platforms is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Worldpay is redefining embedded payments, making them intuitive, customer-centric experiences that can sharpen the competitive edge of software platforms.
worldpay.com
For: Software platforms
worldpay.com
Customers named: ExperianNu SkinReynolds and Reynolds
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Worldpay for Platforms's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: worldpay.com, worldpay.com/en/products/vault, worldpay.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Worldpay for Platforms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Worldpay for Platforms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Worldpay for Platforms by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Worldpay for Platforms is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Worldpay for Platforms, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.