Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Routable · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Routable

41Judge labels
12First choices
2Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Contractor payments for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Routable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement5%8 of 830%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Routable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Routable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels7
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained10 labels4
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Routable - Best overall 1099 automation solution that combines automated 1099 filing with mass payout infrastructure” Llama 4 Maverick · Contractor payments · direct prompt · first choice
“Recognized as the best overall 1099 automation solution” Mistral Small · Contractor payments · direct prompt · first choice
“Use Routable if you're doing high-volume programmatic disbursements with unique tax-form needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contractor payments · direct prompt · alternative
“High volume (hundreds+ contractors, frequent payouts) → Routable or Deel's "Contractor" plan” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Routable, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Routable was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deel27 of 413Not in the top three
Tipalti25 of 418Not in the top three
Remote18 of 412Not in the top three
Gusto17 of 414Not in the top three
Worksuite14 of 412Not in the top three
Wingspan13 of 410Not in the top three
Rippling11 of 412Not in the top three
BILL11 of 411Not in the top three
Papaya Global10 of 412Not in the top three
WorkMarket7 of 412Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Routable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 41 answers that named Routable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

routable.comYour site33
worksuite.com30
remote.com22
wingspan.app22
contractor-of-record.com17
learn.g2.com16
guideflow.com15
riseworks.io15
deel.com10
gusto.com10

157 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming Routable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Routable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Routable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at routable.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack