Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Sage Expense Management · September 2026 Edition

Sage · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Sage Expense Management

6Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sage Expense Management was named 2 times in Expense management, where Ramp led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 37

under the label threshold

Mid-market46 of 46

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 41

under the label threshold

In expense management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sage Expense Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Expense management	Spend and procurement	0%	46 of 46	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sage Expense Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sage Expense Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Notable for a recent update that triggered a flood of negative app-store ratings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Expense management · negative prompt · hard negative

“Frustrating user experience with basic tasks” Kimi K2 · Expense management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sage Expense Management, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sage Expense Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ramp5 of 63Not in the top three

Zoho Expense5 of 62Not in the top three

BILL Spend & Expense5 of 60Not in the top three

Expensify5 of 60Not in the top three

SAP Concur4 of 60Not in the top three

Brex3 of 62Not in the top three

Emburse3 of 60Not in the top three

Mercury1 of 61Not in the top three

Mint1 of 60Not in the top three

Navan1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sage Expense Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named Sage Expense Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com3

g2.com3

trustpilot.com3

airwallex.com2

capterra.co.uk2

fylehq.com2

ofx.com2

reddit.com2

softwareadvice.com2

uk.trustpilot.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Sage Expense Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/products/bill-spend-expense-formerly-divvy/reviews3

g2.com/products/sage-expense-management/reviews3

trustpilot.com/review/www.concur.com3

capterra.com/p/97594/Expensify/reviews2

g2.com/products/emburse-expense-enterprise-formerly-chrome-river-expense/reviews2

g2.com/products/expensify/reviews2

g2.com/products/sap-concur/reviews2

ofx.com/en-us/blog/best-expense-management-software-solutions2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sage Expense Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sage Expense Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Sage Expense Management (formerly Fyle) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sage Expense Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sage Expense Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sage.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.