Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets · September 2026 Edition
Sage · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets

2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets was named 1 time in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Fixed asset accountingAccounting and close2%15 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets (Most frequently cited for mid-market)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Asset Panda2 of 20Not in the top three
NetSuite Fixed Assets Management2 of 20Not in the top three
Acumatica1 of 20Not in the top three
IBM Maximo1 of 20Not in the top three
Infor EAM1 of 20Not in the top three
MRI Fixed Asset Accounting1 of 20Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central1 of 20Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance1 of 20Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets1 of 20Not in the top three
SAP Asset Accounting1 of 20Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org2
wifitalents.com2
worldmetrics.org2
asset.accountant1
assetcues.com1
bassets.net1
blog.9cv9.com1
capterra.com1
capterra.in1
financesonline.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sage Fixed Assets / Sage Intacct Fixed Assets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sage.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack