Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance · September 2026 Edition
Microsoft Dynamics · 7 categories · Ranked

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance

97Judge labels
9First choices
9Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
7Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Fixed asset accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 42 of 133 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%42 of 1330%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Fixed asset accountingAccounting and close0%33 of 940%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%
Accounting softwareAccounting and close0%24 of 560%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%
Accounts payable automationSpend and procurement0%47 of 600%1under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19%
Cash flow forecastingTreasury and cash0%63 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
ERP systemsAccounting and close0%37 of 700%1under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 38%
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%45 of 680%1under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501304
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels2
Paraphrase22 labels1
Comparative19 labelsNone
Budget-constrained21 labels6
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative97 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you're already heavily invested in Microsoft, Dynamics 365 Finance lets you leverage Power BI and Excel for reporting” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial reporting · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance if you already live in the Microsoft ecosystem” Perplexity Sonar · Accounting software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“a strong choice if your company already uses the Dynamics ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative
“Ideal for businesses already entrenched in the Microsoft ecosystem.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Oracle NetSuite63 of 9615Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA47 of 9611Not in the top three
Sage Intacct37 of 963Not in the top three
Workday Financial Management27 of 961Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP25 of 965Not in the top three
Acumatica17 of 964Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA Finance12 of 968Not in the top three
Xero12 of 960Not in the top three
BlackLine10 of 960Not in the top three
QuickBooks9 of 960Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 96 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org30
softwareconnect.com27
gitnux.org23
erpresearch.com21
wifitalents.com20
guideflow.com19
houseblend.io19
softwareadvice.com19
techrepublic.com17
toolradar.com16

211 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Dynamics 1Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack