Every category where a model named Salesforce Net Zero Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	76 of 76	55%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesforce Net Zero Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesforce Net Zero Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“It is the best choice if your sustainability team is already using Salesforce tools.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Organizations already on Salesforce.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“recommend steering clear of ESG solutions from major tech firms, as these may not be as specialized or effective” Mistral Small · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid these platforms *unless* your organization’s entire data architecture is already deeply integrated into their ecosystem” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

“incredibly powerful, but they often require massive budgets, specialized internal teams, and months of complex integration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · soft negative

“IBM, Salesforce, and other big tech firms may not be the best options as their solutions may be inferior” Llama 4 Maverick · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce Net Zero Cloud, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce Net Zero Cloud was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva23 of 3311Not in the top three

IBM Envizi22 of 331Not in the top three

Watershed18 of 336Not in the top three

Persefoni18 of 331Not in the top three

Sweep15 of 333Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower13 of 330Not in the top three

Novisto11 of 330Not in the top three

Greenly10 of 333Not in the top three

Sphera10 of 330Not in the top three

Diligent ESG9 of 330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce Net Zero Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 33 answers that named Salesforce Net Zero Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com17

gartner.com16

esg-one.co9

reddit.com9

coolset.com8

pulsora.com8

sopact.com8

rajeshkumar.xyz7

linkedin.com6

finantrix.com5

Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Net Zero Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software16

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software14

reddit.com/r/consulting/comments/1e8kjk0/what_are_the_best_esg_reporting_solutions_in_the9

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison8

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software8

sopact.com/use-case/esg-reporting-platforms8

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools7

rajeshkumar.xyz/blog/esg-reporting-platforms7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesforce Net Zero Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesforce Net Zero Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.

Salesforce 3Salesforce NZC Growth 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Net Zero Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Net Zero Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sales.tax is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.