Every category where a model named Oracle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ERP systems	Accounting and close	0%	64 of 70	67%	6	under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 38%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	91 of 95	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	79 of 80	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	54 of 68	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	50 of 52	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	57 of 60	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%
B2B credit management	Receivables and billing	0%	77 of 82	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	75 of 86	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	108 of 133	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	74 of 94	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	79 of 85	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	122 of 127	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	120 of 124	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	4	4
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	7	7
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labelsNone

Scale-constrained19 labelsNone

Negative46 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative103 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oracle Fusion ERP (large enterprises), NetSuite (small to large businesses)” Kimi K2 · ERP systems · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you must avoid the classic mistake of evaluating enterprise-level P2P suites... (such as SAP Ariba or complex Oracle deployments)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Procure-to-pay · scale prompt · hard negative

“you generally want to avoid heavy enterprise platforms like Anaplan or Oracle (which cost tens of thousands annually)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative

“You generally want to avoid enterprise giants (like SAP Ariba or Oracle) due to their high price tags” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like Oracle/Esker unless you're scaling fast; they add overhead.” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B credit management · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP50 of 1031Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite15 of 1030Not in the top three

Anaplan14 of 1032Not in the top three

SAP Ariba14 of 1031Not in the top three

OneStream12 of 1033Not in the top three

Workday12 of 1030Not in the top three

Coupa10 of 1030Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning10 of 1030Not in the top three

Planful9 of 1032Not in the top three

Vena9 of 1031Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 103 answers that named Oracle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com25

g2.com22

worldmetrics.org21

guideflow.com18

erpresearch.com14

learn.g2.com13

reddit.com13

softwareconnect.com13

capterra.com11

linkedin.com11

161 of the 161 domain citations in answers naming Oracle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

costarmanager.com/blog/7-reasons-erp-platforms-are-a-bad-choice-for-lease-accounting-compl5

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software5

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-fpa-software-20264

costarmanager.com/blog/five-reasons-lease-accounting-software-systems-fail4

costarmanager.com/blog/why-lease-accounting-software-systems-fail4

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software4

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software4

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle (Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP + NetSuite) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.