Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › SAP Business ByDesign · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

SAP Business ByDesign

5Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP Business ByDesign was named 4 times in ERP systems and 2 other categories, where Oracle NetSuite led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Business ByDesign for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ERP systemsAccounting and close0%46 of 7050%2under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 38%
Accounting softwareAccounting and close0%34 of 560%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%92 of 1330%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Business ByDesign yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Business ByDesign across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“strong for process rigor and international operations, but can be heavier to implement” GPT-5.4 mini · ERP systems · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Business ByDesign, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Business ByDesign was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Oracle NetSuite5 of 53Not in the top three
Sage Intacct4 of 51Not in the top three
Acumatica3 of 50Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 3652 of 51Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance2 of 50Not in the top three
QuickBooks2 of 50Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA2 of 50Not in the top three
Xero2 of 50Not in the top three
Board1 of 50Not in the top three
Brightpearl1 of 50Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Business ByDesign. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named SAP Business ByDesign and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com3
learn.g2.com2
techrepublic.com2
thecfoclub.com2
toolradar.com2
capterra.com1
cledara.com1
dirjournal.com1
dupple.com1
erp-pilot.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming SAP Business ByDesign came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP Business ByDesign

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Business ByDesign; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP Business ByDesign / SAP S/4HANA Cloud 1SAP ByD 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Business ByDesign's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Business ByDesign, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sapbusinessbydesign.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack