Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Intuit Enterprise Suite · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Intuit Enterprise Suite

12Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intuit Enterprise Suite was named 4 times in Accounting software and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In accounting software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intuit Enterprise Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Accounting softwareAccounting and close0%14 of 560%3under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%
AI accounting assistantsAccounting and close0%41 of 790%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intuit Enterprise Suite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intuit Enterprise Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sage Intacct or Intuit Enterprise Suite are better fits for companies that need deeper reporting” GPT-5.4 mini · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Intuit Enterprise Suite acts as a highly competitive "bridge" ERP specifically for this segment.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · direct prompt · alternative
“A close alternative is Intuit Enterprise Suite” GPT-5.4 mini · Accounting software · direct prompt · alternative
“Intuit Enterprise Suite is the natural next step” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounting software · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intuit Enterprise Suite, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intuit Enterprise Suite was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sage Intacct7 of 124Not in the top three
Oracle NetSuite5 of 120Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central4 of 120Not in the top three
QuickBooks4 of 120Not in the top three
QuickBooks Online4 of 120Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA4 of 120Not in the top three
Xero4 of 120Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP3 of 121Not in the top three
FreshBooks3 of 120Not in the top three
SAP Ariba2 of 121Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intuit Enterprise Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 12 answers that named Intuit Enterprise Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Intuit Enterprise Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intuit Enterprise Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.
Intuit Enterprise Suite (IES) 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intuit Enterprise Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intuit Enterprise Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intuit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack