Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › SAP Cloud ERP · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

SAP Cloud ERP

8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP Cloud ERP was named 5 times in ERP systems and 2 other categories, where Oracle NetSuite led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Cloud ERP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ERP systemsAccounting and close0%26 of 700%2under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 38%
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%30 of 680%2under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%
Accounting softwareAccounting and close0%35 of 560%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Cloud ERP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Cloud ERP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Cloud ERP, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Cloud ERP was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BlackLine5 of 82Not in the top three
OneStream5 of 81Not in the top three
Workiva5 of 80Not in the top three
FloQast3 of 80Not in the top three
Numeric3 of 80Not in the top three
Oracle NetSuite3 of 80Not in the top three
Trintech Adra3 of 80Not in the top three
Acumatica2 of 80Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA2 of 80Not in the top three
Sage Intacct2 of 80Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Cloud ERP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named SAP Cloud ERP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com6
numeric.io5
gartner.com3
prophix.com3
worldmetrics.org3
bluecopa.com2
dokka.com2
doublehq.com2
erpresearch.com2
getapp.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming SAP Cloud ERP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP Cloud ERP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Cloud ERP; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP S/4HANA / SAP Cloud ERP 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Cloud ERP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Cloud ERP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack