Every category where a model named SAP Sustainability Control Tower for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	17 of 76	17%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Sustainability Control Tower yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Sustainability Control Tower across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose SAP Sustainability Control Tower if you are already deep in SAP.” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: Organizations already deeply embedded in the SAP ERP ecosystem.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you are 100% SAP: Choose SAP Sustainability Control Tower.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Ideal for SAP users only; less flexible for non-SAP orgs” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“incredibly powerful, but they often require massive budgets, specialized internal teams, and months of complex integration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · soft negative

“implementation can take 6-12 months with underwhelming results” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Sustainability Control Tower, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Sustainability Control Tower was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva35 of 3619Not in the top three

Novisto27 of 360Not in the top three

IBM Envizi26 of 361Not in the top three

Watershed22 of 365Not in the top three

Persefoni22 of 361Not in the top three

Pulsora13 of 361Not in the top three

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud13 of 360Not in the top three

Sphera12 of 360Not in the top three

Sweep11 of 362Not in the top three

Diligent ESG10 of 360Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Sustainability Control Tower. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 36 answers that named SAP Sustainability Control Tower and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com30

gartner.com24

esg-one.co17

pulsora.com16

coolset.com15

onestopesg.com13

aibusinessgeek.com10

horizonesg.global10

sopact.com10

bigeasymagazine.com9

154 of the 154 domain citations in answers naming SAP Sustainability Control Tower came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software30

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software23

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software16

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools15

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison14

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-esg-reporting-software-202610

horizonesg.global/best-esg-reporting-software10

onestopesg.com/esg-resources/best-esg-reporting-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Sustainability Control Tower's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Sustainability Control Tower, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.