Every category where a model named Oracle Tax Reporting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	28 of 98	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Tax Reporting yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Tax Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oracle/SAP-centric enterprise seeking cloud-native provision close with consolidation-ready evidence | Oracle Tax Reporting Cloud” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · alternative

“ERP-native options for companies already consolidated on Oracle or SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Longview, ONESOURCE, Workiva, Oracle Tax Reporting, and Corptax.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Tax Reporting, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Tax Reporting was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bloomberg Tax Provision18 of 212Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision16 of 219Not in the top three

Longview Tax15 of 210Not in the top three

Sovos Tax Provision12 of 213Not in the top three

CSC Corptax11 of 210Not in the top three

Workiva9 of 210Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik5 of 210Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE4 of 212Not in the top three

OneStream Tax Provision4 of 210Not in the top three

Vertex Tax Provision4 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Tax Reporting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named Oracle Tax Reporting and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wifitalents.com17

gitnux.org16

zipdo.co15

pro.bloombergtax.com14

worldmetrics.org13

gartner.com11

rightworks.com10

tax.thomsonreuters.com9

g2.com8

houseblend.io8

121 of the 121 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Tax Reporting came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wifitalents.com/best/tax-provision-software15

worldmetrics.org/best/tax-provision-software12

gartner.com/reviews/market/tax-software11

zipdo.co/best/corporate-tax-provision-software11

gitnux.org/best/tax-provisioning-software10

rightworks.com/blog/best-accounting-tax-software-applications10

gitnux.org/best/tax-provision-software9

pro.bloombergtax.com/insights/tax-solutions/buyers-guide-how-to-find-the-right-tax-provisi9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Tax Reporting

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Tax Reporting; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle Tax Reporting Cloud 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Tax Reporting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Tax Reporting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.