Every category where a model named Pathlock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	22 of 71	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pathlock yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pathlock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Shift to dedicated GRC (Governance, Risk, Compliance) platforms like OneTrust, ServiceNow GRC, or Pathlock for automated workflows.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · negative prompt · alternative

“Enterprises with ERP-heavy environments needing continuous controls monitoring across their application stack.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: ERP Transaction Monitoring (SAP/Oracle)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

“Deep integration with SAP and other ERP platforms.” Mistral Small · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pathlock, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pathlock was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva13 of 172Not in the top three

MetricStream10 of 171Not in the top three

AuditBoard9 of 175Not in the top three

Archer8 of 170Not in the top three

Diligent One Platform8 of 170Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management8 of 170Not in the top three

SAP GRC5 of 170Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud4 of 171Not in the top three

Resolver4 of 170Not in the top three

SAP Audit Management4 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pathlock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Pathlock and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

optro.ai11

worldmetrics.org9

gartner.com8

pathlock.comYour site8

highradius.com7

riskwatch.com7

sprinto.com7

gitnux.org6

netwrix.com6

supervizor.com6

Sixty-seven of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Pathlock came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software7

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-sox-compliance-tools7

sprinto.com/blog/internal-control-software7

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/sox-compliance-software6

optro.ai/blog/best-sox-management-software6

optro.ai/blog/best-internal-control-management-software5

pathlock.com/the-19-best-sox-compliance-software-solutions5

supervizor.com/blog/grc/internal-control/software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pathlock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pathlock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pathlock.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.