Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Tax1099 · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Tax1099

13Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tax1099 was named 3 times in Contractor payments, where Deel led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business5 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market55 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 76

under the label threshold

In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tax1099 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	55 of 83	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tax1099 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tax1099 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tax1099: Charges roughly $1.50 to $2.50 per form... It is IRS-authorized” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contractor payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Affordable per-form pricing; easy to use... Best For: Smaller teams or those with moderate volumes.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tax1099, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tax1099 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gusto9 of 134Not in the top three

Square Payroll6 of 131Not in the top three

Deel6 of 130Not in the top three

Track10995 of 130Not in the top three

Melio4 of 131Not in the top three

Routable4 of 130Not in the top three

Worksuite4 of 130Not in the top three

Found3 of 132Not in the top three

QuickBooks Contractor Payments3 of 131Not in the top three

OnPay3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tax1099. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 13 answers that named Tax1099 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wingspan.app9

relayfi.com8

worksuite.com8

learn.g2.com5

remote.com5

riseworks.io5

gusto.com4

routable.com4

bolto.com3

contractor-of-record.com3

Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Tax1099 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

relayfi.com/blog/best-1099-software-small-businesses-guide8

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software8

wingspan.app/articles/best-contractor-payroll-services7

learn.g2.com/best-contractor-payment-software5

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools5

riseworks.io/blog/best-payroll-providers-for-automated-contractor-payments-and-1099s5

bolto.com/blog/best-1099-software-for-small-business3

firsthr.app/compare/payroll/best-1099-e-file-service3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tax1099's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tax1099, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tax1099.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.