Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Track1099 · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Track1099

10Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Track1099 was named 4 times in Contractor payments, where Deel led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business22 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market57 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 76

under the label threshold

In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Track1099 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	57 of 83	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Track1099 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Track1099 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you use your own bank to pay contractors and only need help with the paperwork (1099s)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid pure 1099 filers like Track1099/Avalara (~$0.63–$3/form) if you need ongoing payments.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contractor payments · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Track1099, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Track1099 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gusto10 of 103Not in the top three

Deel6 of 100Not in the top three

Tax10995 of 101Not in the top three

Square Payroll4 of 104Not in the top three

Routable4 of 102Not in the top three

OnPay4 of 100Not in the top three

Remote4 of 100Not in the top three

Worksuite4 of 100Not in the top three

Rippling3 of 101Not in the top three

QuickBooks Contractor Payments3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Track1099. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Track1099 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worksuite.com10

relayfi.com9

learn.g2.com7

wingspan.app7

wifitalents.com6

gusto.com5

remote.com5

routable.com5

firsthr.app4

forbes.com4

Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Track1099 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

relayfi.com/blog/best-1099-software-small-businesses-guide9

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software9

learn.g2.com/best-contractor-payment-software7

wingspan.app/articles/best-contractor-payroll-services7

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools5

routable.com/resources/best-1099-automation-platforms-high-volume-businesses5

riseworks.io/blog/best-payroll-providers-for-automated-contractor-payments-and-1099s4

bolto.com/blog/best-1099-software-for-small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Track1099

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Track1099; a claim can dispute any of them.

Track1099 (Avalara) 1Track1099 (or Tax1099) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Track1099's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Track1099, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at track1099.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.