Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Taxfyle · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Taxfyle

15Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Taxfyle was named 6 times in Corporate tax provision, where Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Taxfyle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate tax provisionTax and compliance2%9 of 980%6under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Taxfyle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Taxfyle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Taxfyle ⭐ (Best for SMBs)” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-market finance organizations wanting tax technology platform with provision workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative
“Other notable options include Taxfyle, Avalara, and CCH Axcess Tax.” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative
“Taxfyle or TaxPoint – Best Value for Lean Mid-Market Teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Taxfyle, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Taxfyle was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bloomberg Tax Provision10 of 152Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision7 of 153Not in the top three
Sovos Tax Provision7 of 150Not in the top three
Vertex Tax Accounting5 of 150Not in the top three
Workiva4 of 150Not in the top three
Longview Tax3 of 150Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE3 of 150Not in the top three
Avalara2 of 150Not in the top three
CCH Axcess Tax2 of 150Not in the top three
CSC Corptax2 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Taxfyle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Taxfyle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org12
pro.bloombergtax.com11
zipdo.co11
gitnux.org10
wifitalents.com9
rightworks.com5
cdn.ymaws.com4
statwharf.com4
viewpointanalysis.com4
cbh.com3

Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Taxfyle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Taxfyle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Taxfyle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at taxfyle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.