Every category where a model named Teampay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	2%	9 of 85	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teampay yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teampay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Teampay is also highlighted for its fast implementation and lightweight approval workflows” Mistral Small · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · first choice

“Teampay is frequently highlighted alongside Ramp for being highly accessible” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · alternative

“Heavy on employee spend/cards? Teampay.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Procure-to-pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Teampay is a strong alternative” Mistral Small · Procure-to-pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teampay, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teampay was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ramp12 of 174Not in the top three

Procurify11 of 175Not in the top three

Precoro11 of 174Not in the top three

Tradogram7 of 170Not in the top three

Coupa6 of 170Not in the top three

SAP Ariba4 of 170Not in the top three

Spendwise4 of 170Not in the top three

ProcureDesk3 of 170Not in the top three

Stampli3 of 170Not in the top three

Cflow2 of 171Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teampay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Teampay and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com17

spendflo.com9

g2.com8

procurify.com6

stampli.com5

tradogram.com5

procuredesk.com4

ramp.com4

siit.io4

softwareconnect.com4

Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Teampay came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-procure-to-pay-software11

learn.g2.com/best-purchasing-software7

spendflo.com/blog/procurement-software-for-small-business-success5

stampli.com/blog/ap-automation/procure-to-pay-software5

tradogram.com/blog/12-best-purchasing-software-for-small-mid-size-companies5

g2.com/discussions/top-rated-p2p-software-for-small-businesses4

procurify.com/blog/best-procure-to-pay-software4

ramp.com/blog/procurement-software-small-business4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teampay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teampay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teampay.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.