Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Trolley · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Trolley

27Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Contractor payments for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trolley for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement7%5 of 830%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trolley yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trolley across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase18 labels5
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Trolley is a recommended freelancer payout software for mid-sized B2B companies” Llama 4 Maverick · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Trolley as the best overall starting point” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Trolley is highly recommended for freelancer payouts” Mistral Small · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best for High Volume & Tax Compliance: Trolley ... Trolley is the strongest choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trolley, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trolley was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deel14 of 278Not in the top three
Gusto14 of 277Not in the top three
Papaya Global10 of 273Not in the top three
Tipalti10 of 272Not in the top three
Wise Business8 of 270Not in the top three
Worksuite6 of 272Not in the top three
Rippling6 of 270Not in the top three
Payoneer5 of 270Not in the top three
BILL3 of 271Not in the top three
Hyperwallet3 of 271Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trolley. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named Trolley and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

contractor-of-record.com20
hr.software17
learn.g2.com15
gitnux.org12
papayaglobal.com11
deel.com10
f6s.com10
selectsoftwarereviews.com10
talentdesk.io9
wise.com8

122 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Trolley came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Trolley

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trolley; a claim can dispute any of them.
Trolley (formerly Payment Rails) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trolley's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trolley, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trolley.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.