Every category where a model named Tungsten Network for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	43 of 108	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tungsten Network yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tungsten Network across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Scaling business needing global compliance: Basware or Tungsten” MiniMax M2.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Receives some of the harshest e-invoicing reviews ... Multiple reviewers called it the worst e-invoicing system they'd used.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative

“described as complex to implement and optimize without specialist effort” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tungsten Network, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tungsten Network was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pagero18 of 233Not in the top three

Basware18 of 231Not in the top three

Sovos13 of 236Not in the top three

HighRadius9 of 232Not in the top three

Vertex8 of 231Not in the top three

Avalara6 of 231Not in the top three

Coupa6 of 230Not in the top three

ClearTax5 of 232Not in the top three

Tipalti5 of 230Not in the top three

OpenText4 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tungsten Network. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 23 answers that named Tungsten Network and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org13

cleartax.com11

gitnux.org11

mindsprint.com11

tungstenautomation.com11

sourceforge.net9

dddinvoices.com8

vatit.com7

zycus.com7

apsentra.com6

Ninety-four of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming Tungsten Network came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/e-invoicing-software11

cleartax.com/global/best-global-e-invoicing-platforms10

tungstenautomation.com/blog/best-electronic-invoicing-solutions10

sourceforge.net/software/e-invoicing/for-enterprise8

worldmetrics.org/best/e-invoicing-software8

worldmetrics.org/best/electronic-invoicing-software8

dddinvoices.com/learn/e-invoicing-providers-segments-comparison-for-20267

gitnux.org/best/einvoice-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tungsten Network

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tungsten Network; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tungsten 2Tungsten Automation (Tungsten Network) 2Tungsten Automation 1Tungsten Network / OB10 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tungsten Network's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tungsten Network, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tungsten-network.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.