Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › VAT IT · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

VAT IT

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. VAT IT was named 2 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market44 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprise22 of 93

under the label threshold

In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named VAT IT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	44 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for VAT IT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated VAT IT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gold standard for strict European e-invoicing mandates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as VAT IT, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VAT IT was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sovos5 of 63Not in the top three

Pagero3 of 62Not in the top three

Avalara3 of 61Not in the top three

Basware3 of 61Not in the top three

Vertex3 of 60Not in the top three

Anrok2 of 61Not in the top three

Taxamo1 of 61Not in the top three

Comarch1 of 60Not in the top three

Fonoa1 of 60Not in the top three

HighRadius1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VAT IT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named VAT IT and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vatit.comYour site4

acquisition-international.com3

mindsprint.com3

tungstenautomation.com3

invoicemonk.com2

sourceforge.net2

taxtech500.com2

wifitalents.com2

zycus.com2

anna.money1

Twenty of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming VAT IT came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

vatit.com/blog/7-best-e-invoicing-compliance-solutions4

acquisition-international.com/7-best-e-invoicing-compliance-solutions-in-20263

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/e-invoicing-software3

tungstenautomation.com/blog/best-electronic-invoicing-solutions3

taxtech500.com/top-10-lists/the-top-10-best-e-invoicing-software-of-20242

wifitalents.com/best/electronic-invoicing-software2

zycus.com/compare/best-e-invoicing-software2

anna.money/blog/guides/best-software-for-making-tax-digital-for-vat1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as VAT IT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as VAT IT; a claim can dispute any of them.

VAT IT (with eezi) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VAT IT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VAT IT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vatit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.