Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Comarch · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Comarch

13Judge labels

2First choices

3Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Comarch was named 1 time in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business111 of 120

under the label threshold

Mid-market87 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprise6 of 93

under the label threshold

In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Comarch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	87 of 108	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Comarch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Comarch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“often difficult to navigate and has a steep learning curve” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Comarch, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Comarch was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Basware9 of 131Not in the top three

Sovos7 of 132Not in the top three

Pagero7 of 130Not in the top three

HighRadius3 of 131Not in the top three

Coupa3 of 130Not in the top three

Mindsprint SprintAP3 of 130Not in the top three

SAP Ariba3 of 130Not in the top three

Zoho Invoice3 of 130Not in the top three

Avalara2 of 130Not in the top three

EDICOM2 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Comarch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named Comarch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com7

mindsprint.com7

vatit.com7

acquisition-international.com5

comarch.comYour site5

tungstenautomation.com5

worldmetrics.org5

gartner.com4

gitnux.org4

apsentra.com3

Forty-seven of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Comarch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

vatit.com/blog/7-best-e-invoicing-compliance-solutions7

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/e-invoicing-software6

acquisition-international.com/7-best-e-invoicing-compliance-solutions-in-20265

tungstenautomation.com/blog/best-electronic-invoicing-solutions5

apsentra.com/best-e-invoicing-software3

comarch.com/trade-and-services/data-management/e-invoicing3

g2.com/products/comarch-edi-and-e-invoicing/reviews3

gartner.com/reviews/market/e-invoicing-compliance-applications3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Comarch

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Comarch; a claim can dispute any of them.

Comarch EDI and e-Invoicing 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Comarch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Comarch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at comarch.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.