Every category where a model named Visible for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	9%	4 of 97	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Visible yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Visible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase22 labels13

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“It is the industry standard for managing investor relationships, tracking metrics, and sending professional updates.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Start with Visible.vc if your priority is streamlining ongoing investor communications and KPI sharing.” Kimi K2 · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd usually recommend Visible.vc if the main goal is clean investor updates, KPI reporting” GPT-5.4 mini · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Visible.vc as the top investor reporting tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“more explicitly aimed at early-stage companies than mid-sized B2B firms” Perplexity Sonar · Board · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Visible, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visible was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Carta9 of 232Not in the top three

Investran6 of 230Not in the top three

Maxio6 of 230Not in the top three

Fairview4 of 230Not in the top three

Notion4 of 230Not in the top three

Aleph3 of 231Not in the top three

Q43 of 231Not in the top three

DocSend3 of 230Not in the top three

Pulley3 of 230Not in the top three

Workiva2 of 232Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visible. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 23 answers that named Visible and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org16

zipdo.co16

getfairview.com14

g2.com12

qubit.capital10

gartner.com9

visible.vc9

valueaddvc.com7

maxio.com6

vcbeast.com6

105 of the 105 domain citations in answers naming Visible came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zipdo.co/best/investor-reporting-software16

worldmetrics.org/best/investor-reporting-software15

getfairview.com/best/investor-reporting-software14

g2.com/categories/investor-reporting/small-business9

gartner.com/reviews/market/investor-relations-ir-software9

qubit.capital/blog/best-investor-relations-tools-software8

valueaddvc.com/blog/top-8-investor-update-tools-for-founders-what-each-does-and-which-is-w7

maxio.com/blog/financial-reporting-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Visible

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Visible; a claim can dispute any of them.

Visible.vc 5

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at visible.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.