Every category where a model named Wardn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	2%	14 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wardn yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wardn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels3

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best ESG reporting software options are Sustain.Life and Wardn” Mistral Small · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wardn, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wardn was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenly15 of 208Not in the top three

Sustain.Life10 of 202Not in the top three

Persefoni9 of 201Not in the top three

Workiva9 of 200Not in the top three

Sweep8 of 200Not in the top three

Coolset7 of 201Not in the top three

Emerald Power5 of 200Not in the top three

Code Gaia4 of 201Not in the top three

Diligent ESG4 of 200Not in the top three

IBM Envizi4 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wardn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Wardn and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wardn.comYour site18

coolset.com13

g2.com13

gartner.com12

climefy.com10

guideflow.com9

onestopesg.com9

emeraldpower.io7

f6s.com7

executesg.com6

Eighty-six of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Wardn came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wardn.com/blog/best-esg-software-for-smbs17

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools13

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software12

g2.com/categories/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-reporting/small-business11

climefy.com/blog/top-5-esg-compliance-software10

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software9

onestopesg.com/esg-resources/best-esg-reporting-software8

emeraldpower.io/articles/top-10-esg-reporting-software-platforms-for-2026-global-guide7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wardn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wardn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wardn.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.