Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Workday P2P/T&E · September 2026 Edition

Workday · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Workday P2P/T&E

10Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workday P2P/T&E was named 3 times in Procure-to-pay and 1 other category, where Procurify led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business71 of 79

under the label threshold

Mid-market82 of 85

under the label threshold

Enterprise41 of 44

under the label threshold

In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workday P2P/T&E for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	82 of 85	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	125 of 127	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday P2P/T&E yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday P2P/T&E across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“procurement platforms that should be avoided or approached with caution include: - Workday P2P and T&E” Llama 4 Maverick · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · hard negative

“one practitioner comment explicitly says to "avoid Workday P2P and T&E as much as possible,"” Perplexity Sonar · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · hard negative

“Workday P2P and T&E — considered by some to avoid if possible” MiniMax M2.5 · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday P2P/T&E, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday P2P/T&E was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Ariba10 of 100Not in the top three

Coupa7 of 101Not in the top three

Jaggaer4 of 100Not in the top three

GEP SMART3 of 100Not in the top three

Ivalua3 of 100Not in the top three

Procurify2 of 101Not in the top three

Apollo.io2 of 100Not in the top three

Basware2 of 100Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement2 of 100Not in the top three

Precoro2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday P2P/T&E. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Workday P2P/T&E and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com9

g2.com5

mindsprint.com5

spendflo.com5

fontsarena.com4

ivalua.com4

precoro.com4

procurify.com4

siit.io4

zycus.com4

Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Workday P2P/T&E came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

reddit.com/r/procurement/comments/1ha9ll9/best_procurement_software9

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/b2b-procurement-platform5

fontsarena.com/blog/critical-mistakes-to-avoid-when-selecting-a-procurement-platform4

procurify.com/blog/10-common-procurement-mistakes-and-how-to-solve-them4

siit.io/blog/best-procurement-software4

spendflo.com/blog/cloud-procurement-tools4

doss.com/trends/best-procurement-platforms-for-2026-a-complete-buyers-guide-for-physical-p3

elementum.ai/blog/best-procurement-software-for-automating-purchasing-processes3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday P2P/T&E

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday P2P/T&E; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workday P2P and T&E 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday P2P/T&E's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday P2P/T&E, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.