ERP systems for enterprise buyers
Asked as “ERP system”, and as “enterprise resource planning software for finance”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
52%
Clear leader
52SAP S/4HANA26Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP10Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations12others
52% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+9Since September 2026: 48% → 57%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.SAP S/4HANA held the lead, +9 points on 48%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Odoo39%Contested▲+11Since September 2026: 31% → 42%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Oracle NetSuite39%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 38% → 39%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
SAP S/4HANA52%Clear leader▲+9Since September 2026: 48% → 57%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Odoo39%Contested▲+11Since September 2026: 31% → 42%, +11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketOracle NetSuite39%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 38% → 39%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseSAP S/4HANA52%Clear leader▲+9Since September 2026: 48% → 57%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01SAP S/4HANA52%14%74endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 48% → 57%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 57%
SAP S/4HANA52%14%74endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 48% → 57%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.48% → 57%02
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP26%9%66accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 20% → 25%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 25%
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP26%9%66accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 20% → 25%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 25%03
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations10%6%34accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 11%
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations10%6%34accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 11%04
Workday Financial Management2%5%39accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
Workday Financial Management2%5%39accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%05Microsoft Dynamics 3652%10%29accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
06
Acumatica2%46%13criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Acumatica2%46%13criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Oracle NetSuite0%34%35criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Oracle NetSuite0%34%35criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%07
Infor CloudSuite0%19%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Infor CloudSuite0%19%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Oracle NetSuite vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralOracle NetSuite vs Microsoft Dynamics 365Oracle NetSuite vs SAP Business OneOracle NetSuite vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPOdoo vs ERPNextOdoo vs Sage IntacctOdoo vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralOdoo vs Microsoft Dynamics 365Odoo vs SAP Business OneOdoo vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPERPNext vs Sage IntacctERPNext vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralERPNext vs Microsoft Dynamics 365ERPNext vs SAP Business OneERPNext vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPSage Intacct vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSage Intacct vs Microsoft Dynamics 365Sage Intacct vs SAP Business OneSage Intacct vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Microsoft Dynamics 365Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs SAP Business OneMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPMicrosoft Dynamics 365 vs SAP Business OneMicrosoft Dynamics 365 vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPSAP Business One vs Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304M05
060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01SAP S/4HANA52%
SAP S/4HANA52%02Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP26%
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP26%03Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations10%
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations10%04Workday Financial Management2%
Workday Financial Management2%05Microsoft Dynamics 3652%
06Acumatica2%
Acumatica2%07Infor CloudSuite0%
Infor CloudSuite0%08Oracle NetSuite0%
Oracle NetSuite0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Oracle NetSuite34%
12 of 35 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“some AI models flag it as "approach with high caution" for large enterprises due to potential underestimation of process change requirements” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
SAP S/4HANA14%
10 of 74 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“SAP S/4HANA has a steep learning curve, requires skilled consultants, and has lengthy deployments, which can result in significant total cost of ownership” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Odoo86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“While Odoo is excellent for small to mid-sized businesses, it is often considered a risk for large enterprises.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Acumatica46%
6 of 13 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“it is fundamentally built for the mid-market. Large enterprises may find its architecture less robust” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1051 links across 285 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
57 answers · 231 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 12 models
vendor site · NetSuite18 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
14 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Zapier13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · SAP12 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best erp system”, “erp system”, “erp systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP S/4HANA sap.com | 52% | 178 | 376 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 | 2 | |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP 26% | 26% | 147 | 3,600 | 11 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | 1 |
| Microsoft Dynamics microsoft.com Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations 10% | 10% | 41 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | |||
| Workday parent site Workday Financial Management 2% | 2% | 110 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | 2% | 12,100 | 604 | |||||
| Oracle Fusion ERP Cloud | 2% | |||||||
| SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition | 2% | |||||||
| SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud / Private Cloud | 2% | |||||||
| Acumatica acumatica.com Acumatica 2%, Acumatica Enterprise Edition 0% | 2% | 132 | 12,100 | 242 | 130,487 | $2,934 | 120 | |
| Infor CloudSuite infor.com | 0% | 45 | 1,600 | 68 | 313,194 | $15,428 | 48 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (sap.com). The first result for “best erp system” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ERP system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which enterprise resource planning software for finance would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade ERP systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ERP system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a ERP system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ERP systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SAP S/4HANAagainst: Oracle NetSuiteSAP S/4HANAHeldSAP S/4HANAMicrosoft Dynamics 365against: SAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA
Three alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPThree alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPFour alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPGPT-5.4 miniOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAChangedagainst: Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAagainst: Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operationsno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Microsoft Dynamics 365Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementSix alternatives
Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementGemini 3.5 FlashSAP S/4HANAOracle Fusion Cloud ERPChangedno first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAagainst: MS Dynamics, Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks, Sageagainst: Acumatica, Infor Lawson, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Odoo, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks, SAP ECC, Sage, Sage 50, Sage Intacct, Zoho One
Five alternatives
Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementThree alternatives
Acumatica, Odoo, Plex ERPFour alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementPerplexity SonarSAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAHeldSAP S/4HANAOracle Fusion ERP Cloudno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPFour alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementOne alternative
SAP S/4HANAGrok 4.1 FastOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAChangedno first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operationsno first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Epicor Kinetic, IFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, QuickBooks, SAP Business One, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct, Xero
Three alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAMistral SmallSAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAHeldno first choiceSAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Two alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashSAP S/4HANAOracle Fusion Cloud ERPChangedSAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operationsno first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite, Infor LN, Odoo, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Sage X3
Four alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementChangedSAP S/4HANAno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA
Qwen 3.7 FlashSAP S/4HANAMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAChangedSAP S/4HANAMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operationsno first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Apache OFBiz, Base Odoo, Dolibarr, Older Versions of Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle NetSuite, SAP ECC, Sage Intacct
Four alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAKimi K2SAP S/4HANAOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAChangedno first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operationsagainst: Acumatica, Epicor Kinetic, IFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo, Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct, Workday Financial Management
Four alternatives
Epicor Prophet 21, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Workday Financial ManagementTwo alternatives
Acumatica Enterprise Edition, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & OperationsTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANAGLM 4.7 FlashXSAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAHeldOracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANASAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Odoo, Oracle, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion ERP Cloud, Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPFive alternatives
IFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, Sage 300, Workday Financial ManagementThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementMiniMax M2.5SAP S/4HANAOracle Fusion Cloud ERPChangedSAP S/4HANAMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operationsno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteOne alternative
SAP S/4HANAGPT-6 LunaSAP S/4HANAOracle Fusion Cloud ERPChangedno first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Workday Financial ManagementSAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Editionno first choiceagainst: Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics GP, SAP Business One, SAP Business Suite 7 / older SAP ERP 6.0 deployments without a funded transition plan, Sage Intacct
Three alternatives
Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementFive alternatives
IFS Cloud, Infor CloudSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANATwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERPMuse Glimmer 30BSAP S/4HANA Public Cloud / Private Cloudagainst: Sage IntacctOracle Fusion Cloud ERPChangedMicrosoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAAcumaticano first choiceagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Odoo, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Business ByDesign, SAP Business One, SAP S/4HANA, TallyPrime ERP
Three alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP S/4HANAThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANABold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:46 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 25 | 127 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 1 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:16 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 12 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 25 | 68 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 16 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 20 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 24 | 148 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 6 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 17 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:16 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 24 | 83 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 24 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 25 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 10 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 24 | 126 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 18 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica Cloud ERP read as Acumatica
Dynamics 365 Business Central read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Dynamics 365 Finance read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
Epicor read as Epicor Kinetic
Infor read as Infor CloudSuite
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management (F&SCM) read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (owned by Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite ERP read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud (Fusion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle ERP Cloud (incl. NetSuite) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
SAP read as SAP S/4HANA
Workday read as Workday Financial Management
Workday (Financial Management & HCM) read as Workday Financial Management
Workday ERP / Workday Financial Management read as Workday Financial Management
Workday Enterprise Management Cloud read as Workday Financial Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Acumatica Enterprise Edition
Base Odoo
Infor LN
Microsoft Dynamics AX
Older Versions of Oracle E-Business Suite
Oracle Fusion ERP Cloud
Plex ERP (by Rockwell Automation)
Ramco ERP
SAP Business Suite 7 / older SAP ERP 6.0 deployments without a funded transition plan
SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud / Private Cloud
Sage X3, Sage 300
TallyPrime ERP
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.