Financial close management
Asked as “financial close management software”, and as “month-end close software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
55%
Clear leader
55FloQast15Numeric07Easy Month End24others
55% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.FloQast held the lead, −6 points on 60%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Numeric25%Contested▼−13Since September 2026: 36% → 23%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
FloQast55%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
BlackLine67%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 64% → 64%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Numeric25%Contested▼−13Since September 2026: 36% → 23%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast55%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseBlackLine67%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 64% → 64%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01FloQast55%19%57endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.60% → 53%
FloQast55%19%57endorsed leader▼−6Since September 2026: 60% → 53%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.60% → 53%02Numeric15%7%44accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 12%
Numeric15%7%44accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 12%03
Prophix4%0%17accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
Prophix4%0%17accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%04
Trintech2%14%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Trintech2%14%14accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%05
Workiva2%33%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Workiva2%33%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%06BlackLine2%48%56criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
BlackLine2%48%56criticized challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
OneStream0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneStream0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Trintech Adra0%5%19accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Trintech Adra0%5%19accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01FloQast55%
FloQast55%02Numeric15%
Numeric15%03Prophix4%
Prophix4%04Trintech2%
Trintech2%05Workiva2%
Workiva2%06BlackLine2%
BlackLine2%07Trintech Adra0%
Trintech Adra0%08OneStream0%
OneStream0%What they warned about
Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen 3.7 Flash changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BlackLine48%
27 of 56 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Frequently flagged (56% negative labels across models). Common issues include long, difficult implementations, integration challenges, complex/clunky interfaces” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Workiva33%
10 of 30 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Often criticized as overly complex and expensive for non-enterprise or mid-market needs; ... avoid if scalability or cost is a concern.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
FloQast19%
11 of 57 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid Enterprise Tools**: BlackLine/FloQast/Workiva are powerful ... overkill for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
OneStream25%
4 of 16 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid These If Budget-Constrained ... custom-priced enterprise solutions, generally out of reach” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1041 links across 251 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 25 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Numeric45 answers · 81 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Bluecopa42 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G241 answers · 43 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G238 answers · 55 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Guideflow31 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Datarails26 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Maxima26 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Prophix23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Tabs19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics16 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HighRadius15 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 13 models
36 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial close management software”, “close management tools”, “financial close management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FloQast floqast.com | 55% | 377 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| Numeric numeric.io | 15% | 218 | 12,100 | 38,006 | 94,254 | $426 | 9 | 3 |
| Easy Month End easymonthend.com | 7% | 15 | 10 | 0 | 776 | |||
| Prophix prophix.com | 4% | 237 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | |
| Xenett xenett.com | 4% | 7 | ||||||
| Financial Cents financial-cents.com | 4% | 16 | 5,400 | 54 | 17,974 | 19 | ||
| Trintech trintech.com Trintech 2%, Trintech Adra 0%, Adra Balancer 0% | 2% | 101 | 1,900 | 44 | 30,370 | 13 | ||
| Planful planful.com | 2% | 341 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Double doublehq.com | 2% | 24 | 135,000 | 350,313 | 5,860 | 11 | ||
| Workiva workiva.com | 2% | 596 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, highradius.com, numeric.io). The first result for “best financial close management software” is bcsprosoft.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial close management software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which month-end close software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top close management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial close management software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a financial close management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which close management tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5FloQastFloQastHeldno first choiceNumeric's Essentials packageagainst: Cubeno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Numeric, Trintech AdraFour alternatives
DOKKA Close, HighRadius, Numeric, TrintechThree alternatives
Datarails, Planful, SlashGPT-5.4 miniFloQastFloQastHeldno first choiceClosing Folders, FloQastagainst: BlackLine, CCH Tagetikno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BlackLine, Trintech, Trintech Adra, WorkivaOne alternative
BlackLineOne alternative
LiveFlowGemini 3.5 FlashFloQastagainst: BlackLineFloQastHeldagainst: BlackLine, WorkivaBlackLine, FloQast, NumericEasy Month Endagainst: BlackLine, FloQastFloQastagainst: BlackLineagainst: Asana, BlackLine, FloQast, Jira, Monday.com, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle NetSuite, SAP, Sage Intacct, Trello, Trintech Cadency
Two alternatives
Numeric, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
Numeric, Trintech AdraFive alternatives
CCH Tagetik, HighRadius, OneStream, Trintech, WorkivaFour alternatives
CloseCore, Numeric, SkyStem ART, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
Numeric, Trintech AdraPerplexity SonarFloQastFloQastHeldno first choiceNumericagainst: Cube, Financial Centsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BlackLine, ProphixThree alternatives
BlackLine, Datarails, HighRadiusOne alternative
PlanfulGrok 4.1 FastFloQastagainst: BlackLineFloQastHeldBlackLineNumericagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, WorkivaFloQastagainst: BlackLineagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, Numeric, OneStream, SAP, Workiva
Four alternatives
Cube, Numeric, Prophix, Trintech AdraFour alternatives
BlackLine, Numeric, Trintech Adra, WorkivaThree alternatives
OneStream, Prophix, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
Financial Cents, FinlensThree alternatives
Numeric, OneStream, PlanfulMistral SmallProphixBlackLine, FloQastChangedno first choiceEasy Month Endno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, Numeric, OneStream, Trintech, Workiva
Three alternatives
Bluecopa, FloQast, WorkivaOne alternative
DoubleDeepSeek V4 FlashFloQastagainst: BlackLineNumericChangedagainst: BlackLineFloQastNumericagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, OneStream, Trintech Adra, WorkivaFloQast, Prophixagainst: BlackLineagainst: BlackLine, DocuSign, FloQast, HelloSign / Dropbox Sign, Qualia, Workiva
Three alternatives
Numeric, Planful, Trintech AdraTwo alternatives
FloQast, Trintech AdraFive alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Trintech, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Easy Month End, XenettThree alternatives
Numeric, Trintech, WorkivaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFloQastChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BlackLine, DatarailsQwen 3.7 FlashFloQast, WorkivaFloQastChangedagainst: BlackLineno first choiceEasy Month Endagainst: Excel/Google SheetsTrintechagainst: BlackLinenothing named
Five alternatives
BlackLine, Numeric, OneStream, Prophix, Trintech AdraOne alternative
DatarailsThree alternatives
Puzzle IO, QuickBooks Online, XeroThree alternatives
Close.com, Kira Systems, PlanfulKimi K2FloQastagainst: BlackLineFloQastHeldNumericNumericagainst: WaveFloQast, Numericagainst: BlackLineagainst: BlackLine, Close, FloQast, Planful, Workiva
Two alternatives
Numeric, Trintech AdraThree alternatives
BlackLine, Datarails, NumericFive alternatives
BlackLine, FloQast, OneStream, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Xero, Zoho BooksOne alternative
ProphixGLM 4.7 FlashXFloQastagainst: BlackLineFloQastHeldno first choiceDouble, Easy Month End, Financial Cents, Xenettagainst: FloQast, Trintech Cadencyno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Numeric, Prophix, WorkivaThree alternatives
BlackLine, Numeric, Trintech AdraFive alternatives
Adra Balancer, GnuCash, LiveFlow, MODLR, NumericMiniMax M2.5FloQastagainst: HighRadius, NumericFloQastHeldagainst: QuickBooks Online, Xerono first choiceFinancial Cents, XenettPlanfulagainst: BlackLine, Workivaagainst: Workiva
Three alternatives
Cube, Prophix, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Adra Balancer, SkyStem ARTThree alternatives
Double, FloQast, NumericTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctGPT-6 LunaFloQastFloQastHeldagainst: BlackLineFloQastNumericagainst: FloQastno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, Generic project-management tools or spreadsheets
Two alternatives
BlackLine, NumericOne alternative
NumericFive alternatives
BlackLine, Numeric, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Sage Intacct Close Automation, Trintech CadencyOne alternative
ClickUpMuse Glimmer 30BFloQastFloQastHeldagainst: Trintech Cadencyno first choiceNumericagainst: BlackLine, OneStream, Trintech, novaclyno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, Oracle, SAP, Workivaagainst: Close, Salesforce
Three alternatives
BlackLine, Numeric, Trintech AdraThree alternatives
BlackLine, Numeric, TrintechFour alternatives
BlackLine, FloQast, Numeric, WorkivaFour alternatives
Double, Easy Month End, Financial Cents, XenettTwo alternatives
FloQast, Trintech AdraBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 20 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 6 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 29 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 22 | 58 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:30 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 14 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:34 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:27 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 21 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 17 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:39 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 15 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 25 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 23 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 23 | 79 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 22 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
Noise floor in this category
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
ShowHide
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 of 3 flipped
GPT-5.4 mini
1 of 3 flipped
Gemini 3.5 Flash
2 of 5 flipped
Perplexity Sonar
0 of 3 flipped
Grok 4.1 Fast
1 of 5 flipped
Mistral Small
3 of 4 flipped
DeepSeek V4 Flash
3 of 5 flipped
Llama 4 Maverick
2 of 2 flipped
Qwen 3.7 Flash
4 of 5 flipped
Kimi K2
3 of 6 flipped
GLM 4.7 FlashX
2 of 4 flipped
MiniMax M2.5
4 of 5 flipped
GPT-6 Luna
0 of 4 flipped
Muse Glimmer 30B
1 of 4 flipped
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra (by Trintech) read as Trintech Adra
Adra by Trintech read as Trintech Adra
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Prophix One read as Prophix
Prophix One (by Dassault Systèmes) read as Prophix
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Unresolved, counted raw
Attio
Better Proposals
Cirrus Insight
Close.com
Closing Folders
CloudTalk
Generic project-management tools or spreadsheets
HelloSign
HelloSign / Dropbox Sign
Kira Systems
Numeric's Essentials package
Pipeline CRM
Puzzle IO
Qualia
Qwilr
SAP Financial Close apps
Sage Intacct Close Automation
Salesflare
SignEasy
Sonar
novacly
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.