Entity management · September 2026 Edition
Filejet vs Diligent Entities
One of twelve models named Filejet first on the direct prompt; one named Diligent Entities. Filejet was named by eight of the twelve models and Diligent Entities by twelve and Filejet carries 14 labels and Diligent Entities 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share8%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1431A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Filejet reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Commenda was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Athennian vs Filejet · Athennian vs Diligent Entities · EntityKeeper vs Filejet
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the entity management page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FilejetFirst choices, of twelve modelsDiligent Entities
Direct111 against Diligent Entities
Paraphrase001 against Diligent Entities
Comparative021 against Diligent Entities
Budget-constrained204 against Diligent Entities
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Diligent Entities
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Filejet and Diligent Entities stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Filejet Diligent Entities first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Filejet on the left and Diligent Entities on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Filejet and Diligent Entities stood in it.
Filejet first, Diligent Entities an alternative
1 of 12 modelsDiligent Entities was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Kimi K2Filejet alternatives: Athennian, Commenda, Diligent Entities
Diligent Entities first, Filejet not the choice
1 of 12 modelsFilejet was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Entities alternatives: Harbor Compliance
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Commenda alternatives: Athennian, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent Entities
Gemini 3.5 FlashAthennian alternatives: EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBox
Grok 4.1 FastAthennian alternatives: Carta, Diligent Entities, Pulley
DeepSeek V4 FlashAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper
Qwen 3.7 FlashCommenda alternatives: Diligent Entities, LegalX
GLM 4.7 FlashXAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper
MiniMax M2.5Commenda alternatives: Athennian, Diligent Entities, GateWay Entities
Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarCommenda alternatives: Computershare GEMS, Fides
Mistral SmallContractZen alternatives: Commenda, GateWay Entities
Llama 4 MaverickOcorian alternatives: Coverpin, F6S
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Filejet leads by five points.
Filejet7%#5 of 12Diligent Entities2%#8 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Filejet leads by five points.
Filejet8%#5 of 12Diligent Entities3%#6 of 12Enterprise
The order flips: Diligent Entities leads at enterprise.
Diligent Entities30%#1 of 8Filejet0%#– of 8What the models said about Filejet
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For most small companies, EntityKeeper or Filejet are the best starting points due to their low cost” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Filejet (Best Overall Value) ... widely considered one of the most transparent and budget-friendly options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with FileJet if you want the best balance of automation, transparent pricing, and value” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Diligent Entities
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid: Diligent Entities and similar enterprise solutions - typically start at $15,000-$50,000/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Enterprise Tools: Athennian, Diligent Entities, etc., start at $15K+/year—overkill and too pricey” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Diligent Entities or Athennian if budget-constrained” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Diligent Entities is the industry standard for enterprise governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall for legal entity management: Diligent Entities” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“the enterprise standard for multinationals” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Athennian vs FilejetAthennian vs Diligent EntitiesEntityKeeper vs FilejetEntityKeeper vs Diligent EntitiesCommenda vs FilejetCommenda vs Diligent EntitiesContractZen vs FilejetContractZen vs Diligent EntitiesFilejet vs MinuteBoxFilejet vs DiligentDiligent Entities vs MinuteBoxDiligent Entities vs DiligentAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full entity management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.