Every category where a model named Filejet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	8%	5 of 87	0%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Filejet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Filejet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels3

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most small companies, EntityKeeper or Filejet are the best starting points due to their low cost” Mistral Small · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“Filejet (Best Overall Value) ... widely considered one of the most transparent and budget-friendly options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with FileJet if you want the best balance of automation, transparent pricing, and value” Kimi K2 · Entity management · direct prompt · first choice

“look for platforms that integrate software with automated filing execution and registered agent services (e.g., Filejet, Athennian, or Discern)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Filejet, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Filejet was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Athennian25 of 337Not in the top three

EntityKeeper22 of 333Not in the top three

Diligent Entities18 of 332Not in the top three

MinuteBox14 of 332Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management14 of 331Not in the top three

Corporify10 of 331Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS8 of 330Not in the top three

Commenda7 of 331Not in the top three

DiliTrust Governance Suite7 of 330Not in the top three

Wolters Kluwer Legisway7 of 330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Filejet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 33 answers that named Filejet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com17

coverpin.com15

worldmetrics.org15

capterra.com13

g2.com11

f6s.com9

techbullion.com9

zipdo.co9

kurums.com8

softwareadvice.com8

114 of the 114 domain citations in answers naming Filejet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared15

getapp.com/operations-management-software/entity-management12

capterra.com/entity-management-software11

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management9

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-20269

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software9

kurums.com/best-entity-management-software-2026-comparison8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Filejet

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Filejet; a claim can dispute any of them.

FileJet 3Filejet Inc. 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Filejet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Filejet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at filejet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.