Every category where a model named TPdoc for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	11%	2 of 101	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TPdoc yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TPdoc across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase15 labels6

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TPdoc and Spherion are the top recommendations due to their ease of use, compliance features, and scalability” Mistral Small · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · first choice

“I would most likely recommend TPdoc if your main need is transfer pricing documentation automation” Perplexity Sonar · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I would recommend TPdoc as your intercompany transfer pricing documentation tool” Mistral Small · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with TPdoc or TPGenie” MiniMax M2.5 · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TPdoc, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TPdoc was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TPGenie18 of 254Compare →

Aibidia10 of 252Compare →

Commenda9 of 250Compare →

Exactera Transfer Pricing6 of 250Compare →

Caribou5 of 253Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE5 of 250Not among the top eight

myTransferPricing3 of 252Not among the top eight

Vertex3 of 250Not among the top eight

Optravis2 of 251Not among the top eight

Reptune2 of 251Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TPdoc. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named TPdoc and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getsphere.com16

intrapricing.com16

sourceforge.net16

commenda.io13

gitnux.org12

usecaribou.com11

g2.com10

worldmetrics.org10

zipdo.co8

itechguides.com7

No domain is on file for TPdoc, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

getsphere.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software-for-compliance16

intrapricing.com/blog/top-10-transfer-pricing-documentation-software-tools-in-202615

worldmetrics.org/best/transfer-pricing-software10

gitnux.org/best/transfer-pricing-software9

usecaribou.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software9

g2.com/categories/transfer-pricing7

sourceforge.net/software/transfer-pricing7

commenda.io/blog/big-four-transfer-pricing-alternative6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where TPdoc stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“tpdoc”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

11%

rank 2 of 101 in transfer pricing

Segment leader

30%

TPGenie

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as TPdoc

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TPdoc; a claim can dispute any of them.

TPdoc (by TaxModel / Tax Systems) 1TPdoc (by TaxModel) 1TPdoc (by TaxModel/Tax Systems) 1TPdoc by TaxModel 1

Follow TPdoc

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TPdoc's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TPdoc, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TPdoc by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where TPdoc is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name TPdoc, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where TPdoc is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

TPdoc is among the products AI models recommend first in Transfer pricing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/tax/transfer-pricing/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/tpdoc--transfer-pricing-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Transfer pricing, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Transfer pricing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/tax/transfer-pricing/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/tpdoc--transfer-pricing-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Transfer pricing, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Transfer pricing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/tax/transfer-pricing/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/tpdoc--transfer-pricing-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Transfer pricing, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Transfer pricing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.