Every category where a model named PostHog for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	11 of 81	0%	19	accepted challenger
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	85 of 133	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PostHog yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PostHog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative19 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Free tier up to 1M events, open-source, data control” Kimi K2 · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · first choice

“for a pre-revenue company, the free tier of PostHog or Heap is often sufficient and much more cost-effective” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · alternative

“The Best for Product Behavior: PostHog ... one of the most generous free tiers in the industry.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · alternative

“For a $0/month budget, ProfitWell, Looker Studio, and PostHog (self-hosted) can be used.” Llama 4 Maverick · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PostHog, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostHog was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartMogul40 of 4320Not in the top three

Mixpanel37 of 431Not in the top three

Baremetrics34 of 433Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics31 of 4311Not in the top three

Amplitude29 of 431Not in the top three

Databox28 of 433Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI16 of 431Not in the top three

Heap13 of 430Not in the top three

Looker Studio12 of 433Not in the top three

Geckoboard11 of 430Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PostHog. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 43 answers that named PostHog and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

designrevision.com34

databox.com26

getfairview.com24

baremetrics.com23

saasrise.com17

fastero.com12

taskade.com12

chartsy.app11

artisangrowthstrategies.com10

clickup.com10

179 of the 179 domain citations in answers naming PostHog came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools34

databox.com/10-analytics-tools-that-help-every-team-member-magically-boost-performance18

saasrise.com/blog/saas-metrics-platform-rankings-report17

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-vs-profitwell14

databox.com/best-analytics-tools-saas-companies13

getfairview.com/best/saas-metrics-software12

getfairview.com/blog/best-saas-analytics-tools12

taskade.com/blog/saas-metrics-dashboard-templates12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PostHog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PostHog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at posthog.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.