Every category where a model named Aprio Board Portal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	2%	8 of 97	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aprio Board Portal yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aprio Board Portal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best overall for mid-market B2B companies ... OnBoard or Aprio—both offer intuitive UX and a solid feature set” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · direct prompt · first choice

“is positioned as a top-tier choice for mid-market firms seeking concierge-level support without enterprise pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“If you need more advanced reporting and dashboards: AppDeck (flat $299/mo) or Aprio.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · budget prompt · alternative

“Committed to making governance tools simple and affordable for all boards” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Board · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Solid governance portal, but ensure your team is comfortable with its search and login flows.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aprio Board Portal, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aprio Board Portal was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OnBoard18 of 243Not in the top three

Boardable15 of 242Not in the top three

Nasdaq Boardvantage14 of 243Not in the top three

Diligent Boards10 of 243Not in the top three

BoardEffect10 of 240Not in the top three

Diligent7 of 241Not in the top three

Azeus Convene7 of 240Not in the top three

Govenda6 of 242Not in the top three

BoardPro5 of 242Not in the top three

AppDeck Board Portal5 of 241Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aprio Board Portal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 24 answers that named Aprio Board Portal and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdeck.com13

aprioboardportal.comYour site13

worldmetrics.org12

board-room.org11

fast.io9

g2.com9

boardintelligence.com8

capterra.com8

guideflow.com8

clearpointstrategy.com7

Eighty-five of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Aprio Board Portal came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/board-reporting-software9

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-20268

guideflow.com/blog/board-management-software8

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison7

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software7

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software7

statwharf.com/best/board-portal-software-for-enterprise7

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-20255

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Aprio Board Portal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Aprio Board Portal; a claim can dispute any of them.

Aprio 7

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aprio Board Portal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aprio Board Portal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aprioboardportal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.