Every category where a model named Govenda for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	3%	13 of 87	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	25 of 97	8%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Govenda yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Govenda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative15 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Govenda | 9.5/10 | Enterprise-style workflows, version control, director permissions baked into meeting books” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · comparative prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Govenda as the best all-around corporate governance and entity management tool” Perplexity Sonar · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Boardvantage or Govenda—offer robust permissions, unlimited committees, and AI-powered governance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“High overall scores (9.3/10); good for governance workflows.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Acquired by OnBoard; may be transitioning” Kimi K2 · Board · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Govenda, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Govenda was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Nasdaq Boardvantage19 of 264Not in the top three

OnBoard15 of 263Not in the top three

Diligent Boards13 of 264Not in the top three

BoardPro12 of 261Not in the top three

Azeus Convene10 of 260Not in the top three

Planful10 of 260Not in the top three

Boardable9 of 261Not in the top three

Board Intelligence9 of 260Not in the top three

BoardEffect8 of 261Not in the top three

AppDeck Board Portal8 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Govenda. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 26 answers that named Govenda and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org19

appdeck.com15

board-room.org13

clearpointstrategy.com13

fast.io13

gitnux.org13

g2.com10

nasdaq.com9

boardintelligence.com8

diligent.com8

121 of the 121 domain citations in answers naming Govenda came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/board-reporting-software15

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison13

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software13

gitnux.org/best/board-reporting-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/board-report-software9

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software8

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-20267

board-room.org/7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Govenda

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Govenda; a claim can dispute any of them.

BoardPro/Govenda 1Govenda (by Diligent) 1Govenda by Diligent 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Govenda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Govenda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at govenda.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.