Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Automation Anywhere · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Automation Anywhere

7Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Automation Anywhere was named 3 times in Account reconciliation and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Automation Anywhere for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Account reconciliationAccounting and close0%70 of 72100%2under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Cash applicationReceivables and billing0%72 of 83100%1under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Automation Anywhere yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Automation Anywhere across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00022
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“custom RPA bots (using platforms like UiPath or Automation Anywhere) ... the RPA bot breaks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · hard negative
“DIY UiPath/Automation Anywhere scripts ... Approach with caution unless you have strong IT support to maintain them.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · soft negative
“generic OCR or RPA (UiPath, Automation Anywhere) instead of purpose-built tools... often fail on remittance parsing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Automation Anywhere, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Automation Anywhere was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
UiPath6 of 70Not in the top three
BILL4 of 70Not in the top three
Coupa3 of 71Not in the top three
SAP Concur Invoice3 of 71Not in the top three
Vic.ai3 of 71Not in the top three
Tipalti3 of 70Not in the top three
Basware2 of 70Not in the top three
FloQast2 of 70Not in the top three
Fraxion2 of 70Not in the top three
Ramp2 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Automation Anywhere. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Automation Anywhere and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Automation Anywhere's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Automation Anywhere, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at automationanywhere.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack