Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Bassets eDepreciation · September 2026 Edition

Bassets · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Bassets eDepreciation

17Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bassets eDepreciation was named 8 times in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business10 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market19 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise78 of 90

under the label threshold

In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bassets eDepreciation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	19 of 94	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bassets eDepreciation yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bassets eDepreciation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Pure Depreciation & Tax Compliance: Bassets eDepreciation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“both positioned for mid-sized businesses and depreciation tracking” Perplexity Sonar · Fixed asset accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Finance/accounting-focused with IRS-compliant schedules” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“### 3. Bassets (Runner Up)” MiniMax M2.5 · Fixed asset accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bassets eDepreciation, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bassets eDepreciation was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sage Fixed Assets13 of 175Not in the top three

Asset Panda11 of 171Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets6 of 170Not in the top three

Fixed Asset Pro5 of 170Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite5 of 170Not in the top three

Sage Intacct4 of 171Not in the top three

AssetAccountant3 of 172Not in the top three

QuickBooks3 of 171Not in the top three

Xero3 of 171Not in the top three

MRI Fixed Asset Accounting3 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bassets eDepreciation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Bassets eDepreciation and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org14

bassets.netYour site9

capterra.com9

netgain.tech9

softwareconnect.com9

acquisition-international.com8

gitnux.org8

zipdo.co7

softwareadvice.com6

sourceforge.net6

Seventy-six of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Bassets eDepreciation came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

acquisition-international.com/the-7-best-fixed-asset-depreciation-software-driving-finance8

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-fixed-asset-management-software8

capterra.com/fixed-asset-management-software/s/small-businesses7

softwareadvice.com/accounting/fixed-asset-accounting-software-comparison6

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-asset-register-software6

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software5

houseblend.io/articles/fixed-asset-management-software-comparison5

netgain.tech/blog/fixed-asset-depreciation-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Bassets eDepreciation

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bassets eDepreciation; a claim can dispute any of them.

Bassets 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bassets eDepreciation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bassets eDepreciation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bassets.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.