Every category where a model named Board for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	18 of 52	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	22 of 95	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	23 of 96	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	32 of 133	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	86 of 97	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	64 of 114	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Board yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Board across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	3	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	0	3	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	4	0	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels1

Paraphrase15 labelsNone

Comparative40 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels3

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative98 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Enterprise-wide integrated planning connecting FP&A, close, consolidation, and reporting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Board or Oracle EPM if you want a broader enterprise planning suite” Perplexity Sonar · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for finance teams running repeatable, governed consolidation cycles” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you need Global Consolidation: Go with OneStream or Board.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Good for board books, but consider whether you need deeper analytics... Plan for time-intensive setup and training.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Board, over the 98 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Board was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan79 of 9822Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning71 of 984Not in the top three

OneStream68 of 9811Not in the top three

Pigment50 of 9812Not in the top three

Vena45 of 981Not in the top three

Planful43 of 981Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik36 of 981Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM29 of 987Not in the top three

SAP Analytics Cloud29 of 980Not in the top three

Oracle Cloud EPM25 of 980Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Board. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 98 answers that named Board and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

board.comYour site51

drivetrain.ai40

cfoshortlist.com38

getaleph.com34

gartner.com33

worldmetrics.org31

onestream.com24

viewpointanalysis.com23

cubesoftware.com21

anaplan.com20

264 of the 315 domain citations in answers naming Board came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises30

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-202630

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software29

viewpointanalysis.com/post/financial-planning-and-analysis-software-options-202620

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-fpa-software-202619

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software19

centage.com/blog/best-fp-a-software18

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Board

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Board; a claim can dispute any of them.

Board International 2Board (Boardbookit) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Board's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Board, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at board.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.