Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Bricks Fixed Assets · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Bricks Fixed Assets

7Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bricks Fixed Assets was named 5 times in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bricks Fixed Assets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Fixed asset accountingAccounting and close2%11 of 940%5under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bricks Fixed Assets yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bricks Fixed Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“EZOfficeInventory and Bricks Fixed Assets are the top recommendations due to their affordability” Mistral Small · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“Accurate depreciation (multiple methods), easy data import (Excel/Sage), no per-asset fees. | Per-user pricing adds up.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · alternative
“Low cost with no per-asset fees and no long-term contracts.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bricks Fixed Assets, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bricks Fixed Assets was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EZOfficeInventory6 of 71Not in the top three
Xero4 of 71Not in the top three
AssetTiger3 of 73Not in the top three
Fixed Asset Pro2 of 70Not in the top three
NetSuite Fixed Assets Management2 of 70Not in the top three
Sage Fixed Assets2 of 70Not in the top three
WorthIt Fixed Assets2 of 70Not in the top three
AssetCenter.app1 of 71Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central1 of 71Not in the top three
AssetFrog1 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bricks Fixed Assets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Bricks Fixed Assets and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com7
softwareadvice.com6
capterra.com5
worldmetrics.org5
fitsmallbusiness.com4
xero.com4
getapp.com3
guideflow.com3
sourceforge.net3
thecfoclub.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Bricks Fixed Assets came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bricks Fixed Assets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bricks Fixed Assets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bricks.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack