Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Cashbook · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Cashbook

16Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cashbook was named 8 times in Cash application, where HighRadius led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business29 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 61

under the label threshold

In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cashbook for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	26 of 83	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cashbook yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cashbook across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for mid-sized and enterprise organisations looking for broader finance and Order-to-Cash automation.” Llama 4 Maverick · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative

“if you need more comprehensive Order-to-Cash automation, Cashbook or Bluecopa may be better fits” Mistral Small · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose Tesorio or Cashbook if you want fast time-to-value with strong cloud ERP integration.” Kimi K2 · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative

“Go with Esker or Cashbook if ... you need deep treasury connectivity.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited scope — automation only within finance and receivables management” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cashbook, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cashbook was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HighRadius12 of 168Not in the top three

BlackLine Cash Application10 of 161Not in the top three

Billtrust10 of 160Not in the top three

Esker8 of 160Not in the top three

Versapay8 of 160Not in the top three

Serrala6 of 160Not in the top three

Upflow5 of 163Not in the top three

Rex5 of 161Not in the top three

Bluecopa4 of 160Not in the top three

Chaser4 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cashbook. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 16 answers that named Cashbook and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cashbook.comYour site14

highradius.com11

upflow.io11

bluecopa.com9

lunos.ai9

worldmetrics.org9

chaserhq.com8

rex.inc8

cashflowpick.com6

ledge.co6

Seventy-seven of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Cashbook came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide14

upflow.io/software/best-cash-application-software11

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools10

bluecopa.com/blog/cash-application-softwares9

lunos.ai/blog/best-cash-application-software8

rex.inc/resources/comparisons/best-cash-application-software8

worldmetrics.org/best/cash-application-software7

chaserhq.com/blog/best-cash-application-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cashbook's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cashbook, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cashbook.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.