Every category where a model named Quadient Accounts Receivable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash application	Receivables and billing	5%	8 of 83	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quadient Accounts Receivable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quadient Accounts Receivable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	2	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative8 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best All-Rounder for Mid-Market B2B ... widely recognized as one of the fastest and most user-friendly accounts receivable suites for the mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for All-in-One Order-to-Cash (O2C)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice

“Mid-Market Specialists: *Versapay*, *Quadient AR (formerly YayPay)*, and *Chaser*. These offer fast implementations and great UI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · scale prompt · alternative

“Known as one of the best mid-market tools. It offers predictive cash application” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quadient Accounts Receivable, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quadient Accounts Receivable was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HighRadius19 of 214Not in the top three

Billtrust18 of 210Not in the top three

Versapay13 of 212Not in the top three

BlackLine Cash Application11 of 210Not in the top three

Gaviti9 of 210Not in the top three

Esker8 of 212Not in the top three

Upflow8 of 212Not in the top three

Emagia5 of 210Not in the top three

Serrala5 of 210Not in the top three

Stuut5 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quadient Accounts Receivable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 21 answers that named Quadient Accounts Receivable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com11

bluecopa.com10

lunos.ai9

upflow.io9

cashbook.com8

chaserhq.com8

transformance.ai7

ledge.co6

rex.inc6

cashflowpick.com5

Seventy-nine of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming Quadient Accounts Receivable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bluecopa.com/blog/cash-application-softwares10

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools9

upflow.io/software/best-cash-application-software9

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide8

lunos.ai/blog/best-cash-application-software8

chaserhq.com/blog/best-cash-application-software6

rex.inc/resources/comparisons/best-cash-application-software6

ledge.co/content/cash-application-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Quadient Accounts Receivable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quadient Accounts Receivable; a claim can dispute any of them.

Quadient AR (formerly YayPay) 5Quadient AR 3Quadient 1Quadient AR (Formerly YayPay) 1Quadient Accounts Receivable / cash application tools 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quadient Accounts Receivable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quadient Accounts Receivable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quadient.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.