Every category where a model named Centage Planning Maestro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	2%	11 of 96	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	20 of 114	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	29 of 86	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Centage Planning Maestro yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Centage Planning Maestro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels5

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels3

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with Centage (if you want a dedicated tool at a very low per-user price) or Joiin” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice

“Centage utilizes AI-mapped connectors... shortening implementation to weeks rather than months.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial modeling · direct prompt · alternative

“FP&A platforms (like Abacum or Centage) if you need integrated budgeting and forecasting” Kimi K2 · Cash flow forecasting · scale prompt · alternative

“Purpose-built for mid-market without the overhead of enterprise solutions” Kimi K2 · Financial modeling · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“far lower than enterprise tools like OneStream or Centage ($18K–$40K/year)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Centage Planning Maestro, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Centage Planning Maestro was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fathom21 of 424Not in the top three

Cube20 of 422Not in the top three

Datarails19 of 425Not in the top three

Joiin13 of 425Not in the top three

Vena10 of 420Not in the top three

OneStream8 of 421Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning8 of 421Not in the top three

Anaplan8 of 420Not in the top three

Planful8 of 420Not in the top three

Prophix7 of 420Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Centage Planning Maestro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 42 answers that named Centage Planning Maestro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fathomhq.com27

highradius.com25

prophix.com25

datarails.com17

cubesoftware.com16

softwareconnect.com13

thecfoclub.com12

zipdo.co11

centage.comYour site9

consolidate.io9

155 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming Centage Planning Maestro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams23

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-202421

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors20

datarails.com/best-financial-consolidation-tools-and-software14

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-financial-consolidation-software13

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-financial-consolidation-tools8

barc.com/reviews/consolidation-software7

joiin.co/best-financial-consolidation-software-for-20267

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Centage Planning Maestro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Centage Planning Maestro; a claim can dispute any of them.

Centage 11Centage's Planning Maestro 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Centage Planning Maestro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Centage Planning Maestro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at centage.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.