Every category where a model named Medius for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	5%	7 of 60	0%	16	accepted challenger
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	39 of 80	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	42 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Medius yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Medius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	0	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels3

Paraphrase13 labels2

Comparative35 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Medius - provides AP automation for midsize businesses, removing manual AP tasks, strengthening controls, and gaining real-time visibility” Llama 4 Maverick · Accounts payable automat · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The top AP automation software solutions in 2026 are Medius, Tipalti, Stampli, and AvidXchange.” Llama 4 Maverick · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice

“Yooz and Medius are highly rated mid-market AP automation suites with built-in compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative

“Enterprise workflows/ERP depth | Advanced AI (70–85% touchless); highly configurable” Grok 4.1 Fast · Accounts payable automat · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High‑risk or problematic platforms (to avoid or scrutinize closely) 1. Medius ... difficult setup, steep learning curves, and poor integration experiences.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Medius, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Medius was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tipalti65 of 8510Not in the top three

Coupa55 of 857Not in the top three

Basware40 of 855Not in the top three

BILL37 of 857Not in the top three

HighRadius33 of 857Not in the top three

Stampli33 of 852Not in the top three

AvidXchange33 of 851Not in the top three

Ramp30 of 853Not in the top three

SAP Concur24 of 850Not in the top three

SAP Ariba20 of 851Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Medius. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 85 answers that named Medius and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

medius.comYour site37

highradius.com35

mindsprint.com33

worldmetrics.org28

conseroglobal.com26

ramp.com26

tipalti.com23

zoneandco.com23

makershub.com22

corpay.com20

236 of the 273 domain citations in answers naming Medius came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

conseroglobal.com/resources/best-accounts-payable-software25

medius.com/blog/top-ap-automation-software-compared-features-fit-and-tradeoffs24

zoneandco.com/articles/top-ap-automation-software-solutions22

layer3labs.io/comparisons/best-accounts-payable-automation-software18

learn.g2.com/best-accounts-payable-automation-software14

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/automated-accounts-payable-software14

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/e-invoicing-software14

corpay.com/resources/blog/best-ap-automation-software13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Medius's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Medius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at medius.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.