Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Corcentric · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Corcentric

7Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Corcentric was named 3 times in Supplier management and 1 other category, where Procurify led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market29 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Corcentric for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	29 of 80	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	39 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Corcentric yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Corcentric across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Specifically built for mid-sized businesses | Strong supplier onboarding + document management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Corcentric, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corcentric was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Ariba4 of 71Not in the top three

Coupa4 of 70Not in the top three

Procurify3 of 72Not in the top three

Tipalti2 of 71Not in the top three

GEP SMART2 of 70Not in the top three

Jaggaer2 of 70Not in the top three

Precoro2 of 70Not in the top three

Achilles1 of 70Not in the top three

Avetta1 of 70Not in the top three

BILL1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Corcentric. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 7 answers that named Corcentric and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com4

g2.com2

highradius.com2

procurify.com2

rfp.wiki2

tipalti.com2

wifitalents.com2

worldmetrics.org2

appsource.microsoft.com1

atlassystems.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Corcentric came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/supplier-onboarding-software2

procurify.com/blog/best-accounts-payable-automation-software2

appsource.microsoft.com/en-in/product/web-apps/gep.gep_supplier1

atlassystems.com/blog/best-supplier-onboarding-software1

authbridge.com/blog/best-supplier-onboarding-solutions-20241

avetta.com/1

avetta.com/clients1

avetta.com/clients/solutions/business-risk1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Corcentric

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Corcentric; a claim can dispute any of them.

Corcentric Supplier Management 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corcentric's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corcentric, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at corcentric.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.