Every category where a model named DOKKA Close for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial close management	Accounting and close	2%	7 of 68	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DOKKA Close yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DOKKA Close across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels2

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Numeric and DOKKA are the top recommendations for small businesses” Mistral Small · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · first choice

“If you\u2019re under 5 people and want close + AP in one tool, get a quote from Dokka” Kimi K2 · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative

“3. DOKKA Close: Best for mid-market teams (2–10 person finance functions)” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial close manageme · direct prompt · alternative

“Good for mid-market lean teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DOKKA Close, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DOKKA Close was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FloQast18 of 192Not in the top three

Numeric15 of 197Not in the top three

BlackLine7 of 190Not in the top three

Datarails7 of 190Not in the top three

PivotXL5 of 191Not in the top three

Prophix4 of 191Not in the top three

Vena4 of 190Not in the top three

Workiva4 of 190Not in the top three

Trintech Adra3 of 191Not in the top three

Trintech3 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DOKKA Close. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named DOKKA Close and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dokka.comYour site19

numeric.io18

learn.g2.com15

getapp.com11

financecopilothq.com10

capterra.com8

g2.com8

doublehq.com7

gartner.com6

prophix.com6

Eighty-nine of the 108 domain citations in answers naming DOKKA Close came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software18

dokka.com/best-financial-close-software-for-small-businesses15

learn.g2.com/best-financial-close-software15

financecopilothq.com/best-financial-close-automation-software10

getapp.com/all-software/financial-close/org/small-business10

capterra.com/financial-close-software/s/small-businesses6

dokka.com/best-financial-close-software6

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-close-and-consolidation-solutions6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as DOKKA Close

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DOKKA Close; a claim can dispute any of them.

DOKKA 3Dokka Close 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DOKKA Close's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DOKKA Close, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dokka.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.