Every category where a model named Lucanet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	18 of 96	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	18 of 68	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	42 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lucanet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lucanet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lucanet: Highly structured, great for complex multi-entity, multi-GAAP, and international operations. Very strong on financial governance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · alternative

“LucaNet is highly regarded as a gold standard for strict compliance, statutory consolidation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative

“Lucanet is commonly cited for mid-market European ERP stacks.” Kimi K2 · Financial close manageme · scale prompt · alternative

“A purpose-built, pre-configured financial consolidation tool.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“good tools, but typically positioned at mid-market pricing, so only consider if your budget allows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lucanet, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucanet was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneStream13 of 182Not in the top three

Prophix11 of 182Not in the top three

Vena9 of 180Not in the top three

Planful7 of 181Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik7 of 180Not in the top three

BlackLine6 of 181Not in the top three

FloQast5 of 183Not in the top three

Anaplan5 of 180Not in the top three

Datarails5 of 180Not in the top three

HighRadius4 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lucanet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 18 answers that named Lucanet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com5

cubesoftware.com4

g2.com4

numeric.io4

prophix.com4

taxilla.com4

cfoshortlist.com3

learn.g2.com3

planful.com3

softwareconnect.com3

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Lucanet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

highradius.com/en-gb/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors4

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software4

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-financial-consolidation-tools3

planful.com/best-financial-close-and-consolidation-software3

anaplan.com/blog/ultimate-checklist-for-choosing-financial-consolidation-software2

cfobound.com/tools/financial-consolidation2

cfoshortlist.com/reports/consolidation-tool-buyers-framework2

dokka.com/best-financial-close-software-for-small-businesses2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Lucanet

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lucanet; a claim can dispute any of them.

LucaNet 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lucanet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lucanet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lucanet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.