Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Embat · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Embat

5Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Embat was named 2 times in Account reconciliation and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market68 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Embat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	68 of 72	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	44 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Embat yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Embat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Nomentia / Embat: Outstanding choices if you have significant European operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Integration failures with banks/ERPs, slow syncs, implementation surprises (hidden costs/support dependency)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Embat, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Embat was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Trovata4 of 52Not in the top three

Agicap3 of 50Not in the top three

GTreasury3 of 50Not in the top three

Kyriba3 of 50Not in the top three

Centime2 of 50Not in the top three

ION Treasury2 of 50Not in the top three

Panax2 of 50Not in the top three

Mercury + Treasury1 of 51Not in the top three

ReconArt1 of 51Not in the top three

SolveXia1 of 51Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Embat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named Embat and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aciworldwide.com1

airwallex.com1

amnistreasury.com1

aspireapp.com1

backbase.com1

bluecopa.com1

brainyflavors.com1

business.hsbc.com1

chase.com1

cib.bnpparibas1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Embat came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aciworldwide.com/solutions/aci-enterprise-payments-platform1

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/best-automated-reconciliation-software-solutions1

amnistreasury.com/blog/business-account-comparison1

aspireapp.com/us/blog/chase-bank-vs-wells-fargo1

backbase.com/blog/top-business-banking-platform-providers1

bluecopa.com/blog/account-reconciliation-tools1

brainyflavors.com/blog/what-are-common-pitfalls-when-implementing-reconciliation-automatio1

business.hsbc.com/en-gb/campaigns/international1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Embat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Embat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at embat.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.