Every category where a model named Nomentia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	2%	11 of 72	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	19 of 124	0%	16	accepted challenger
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	31 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	28 of 83	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nomentia yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nomentia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	3
Mistral Small	1	2	2	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FloQast and Nomentia are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“A flexible, cloud-based TMS designed for mid-sized and large enterprises, offering centralized cash management and payment automation.” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative

“Best if you want modular cash/payments automation with strong mid-market usability: Nomentia or GTreasury” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative

“Outstanding choices if you have significant European operations or require heavy multi-bank payment governance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nomentia, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nomentia was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba34 of 4217Not in the top three

GTreasury30 of 425Not in the top three

HighRadius19 of 423Not in the top three

Trovata18 of 427Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management15 of 420Not in the top three

ION Treasury9 of 421Not in the top three

FIS7 of 421Not in the top three

Agicap6 of 423Not in the top three

Float6 of 421Not in the top three

Anaplan6 of 420Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nomentia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 42 answers that named Nomentia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com23

nomentia.comYour site23

treasury.ripple.com19

worldmetrics.org16

eco.com14

highradius.com13

debtbook.com12

gfmag.com11

g2.com10

checkthat.ai9

127 of the 150 domain citations in answers naming Nomentia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems21

treasury.ripple.com/posts/top-10-treasury-management-systems18

nomentia.com/blog/best-treasury-management-solutions14

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-202613

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems12

gfmag.com/transaction-banking/best-treasury-cash-management-providers-2024-systems-service11

euromoney.com/corporate-banking/competitive-intelligence/top-ranked-tms-providers9

viewpointanalysis.com/post/treasury-management-software-options-20269

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nomentia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nomentia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nomentia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.