Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › FinQuery · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

FinQuery

120Judge labels
29First choices
14Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
36% in Lease accounting for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 60 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
10 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 48 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FinQuery for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lease accountingAccounting and close36%1 of 608%48endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FinQuery yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FinQuery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.513004
GPT-5.4 mini20013
Gemini 3.5 Flash40026
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.1 Fast40105
Mistral Small21003
DeepSeek V4 Flash40015
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash22004
Kimi K241005
GLM 4.7 FlashX25007
MiniMax M2.521003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels13
Paraphrase24 labels11
Comparative34 labels16not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained19 labels5
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative120 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 46 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Industry Gold Standard: LeaseQuery (by FinQuery) ... request a demo for both LeaseQuery (for its pure accounting simplicity) and Trullion” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“FinQuery is built "by accountants, for accountants". It operates as a powerful standalone subledger that supports ASC 842, IFRS 16, and GASB standards.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“One of the most popular platforms for mid-sized accounting teams. It was built by CPAs and is highly focused on absolute accounting accuracy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · first choice
“### 1. Best Overall for Mid-Market: FinQuery (formerly LeaseQuery) FinQuery is widely considered the gold standard for mid-market companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“LeaseQuery (FinQuery): "Irreversible changes" after a lease is approved, forced re-approval workflows for minor corrections, limited vehicle entry options” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“major enterprise solutions (like LeaseQuery/FinQuery, Visual Lease, or Trullion) often require hefty annual contracts and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
“consider pricier tools like LeaseQuery/FinQuery, but they're usually not the cheapest route” GPT-5.4 mini · Lease accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
“some users warn that implementation can be heavy and rigid” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FinQuery, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FinQuery was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Trullion50 of 1123Not in the top three
Nakisa Lease Administration41 of 1129Not in the top three
EZLease37 of 1126Not in the top three
MRI ProLease34 of 1121Not in the top three
NetLease27 of 1121Not in the top three
LeaseAccelerator25 of 1121Not in the top three
Black Owl Systems24 of 1122Not in the top three
Crunchafi23 of 1121Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FinQuery. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 95 of the 112 answers that named FinQuery and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com71
blackowlsystems.com54
capterra.com54
debtbook.com52
gartner.com51
trullion.com48
guideflow.com44
g2.com41
acquisition-international.com37
finquery.comYour site35

452 of the 487 domain citations in answers naming FinQuery came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FinQuery

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FinQuery; a claim can dispute any of them.
FinQuery (formerly LeaseQuery) 17LeaseQuery 7LeaseQuery (FinQuery) 4LeaseQuery/FinQuery 4FinQuery (LeaseQuery) 1FinQuery / LeaseQuery 1FinQuery LeaseQuery 1FinQuery/LeaseQuery 1LeaseQuery (Now branded as **FinQuery**) 1LeaseQuery (by FinQuery) 1LeaseQuery (now FinQuery) 1LeaseQuery (now listed as LeaseQuery powered by FinQuery) 1LeaseQuery (now part of FinQuery) 1LeaseQuery / FinQuery 1LeaseQuery by FinQuery 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FinQuery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FinQuery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at finquery.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack